Whether you want to declutter your workspace or permanently remove completed tasks, Asana offers straightforward options to manage your tasks effectively.
We’ll give you a detailed step-by-step guide on how to hide completed tasks in Asana, how to delete the task, and also how to archive those tasks in this article.
To hide completed task in Asana, click on “Filter,” then click on “incomplete tasks,” select the three-dot button, then click “Save the layout as default.”
This will hide the completed tasks in your Asana dashboard, but to delete the tasks, click on the task, select the “Ellipsis menu,” and navigate to the “delete task” button.
How to Hide Completed Tasks in Asana
If you want to hide completed tasks temporarily from your workspace without deleting them, Asana provides a simple way to filter them out.
Step-by-Step guide on hiding tasks in Asana
Open Your Project: Go to the project or task list where the completed tasks are located.
By default, all tasks will be displayed. To focus only on incomplete tasks, because we don’t want unnecessary clutter in our project, click the Filter button.
Use the Filter: On the right side of the task list, click on the “Filter” button (represented by a funnel icon).
Select “Incomplete Tasks.”: From the dropdown menu, click on “Incomplete Tasks” to hide the completed tasks. The tasks will no longer appear in your view, keeping your workspace clean and focused on active tasks.
Before and after hiding completed task in Asana with filter
You can see here that I checked two tasks as completed; after filtering the tasks down to only show me the unfinished tasks, the tasks that are checked as completed are hidden.
Save the layout as default: Go to the “Ellipsis menu” beside the filter menu and then click on “save layout as default.”
Toggle to View Again: If you wish to view completed tasks again, simply uncheck the “Completed Tasks” filter option.
By hiding completed tasks, you keep your current tasks visible, and your project list uncluttered, improving your focus and workflow.
The previous steps shown in the guide will help you hide the tasks, but the tasks will be kept in the system if you need them.
If you want to permanently delete completed tasks from Asana, follow these steps.
Step-by-Step guide on deleting tasks
Go to Your Task List: Open the project or task list where your completed tasks are listed.
Click on the Task: Select the completed task you wish to delete.
Click on the arrow; this will take you to the details section. From there, click on the three-dot menu or more, then navigate to the delete section.
Delete the Task:
In the task details view, click on the three-dot menu (More options) in the upper-right corner.
From the dropdown, select “Delete Task.”
Confirm Deletion: Asana will ask for confirmation before deleting the task. There will be a popup notification in the bottom left corner, which will stay there for 15 seconds; you can undo the deletion within that time; there’s also an option that’ll come up on top of the task details, where you’ll have two options: 1. Undo and 2.permanently delete. Confirm to permanently delete the task. This will also delete all the subtasks.
Note that after selecting permanently delete, you cannot recover the task anymore. However, you can recover the tasks that you deleted without clicking on permanent deletion within 30 days
There’s a more efficient and automated way to hide completed tasks. In Asana, you can use rules to automatically hide completed tasks from view, which helps keep your project board or task list clean and focused. Here’s a step-by-step pro tip for setting this up:
1. Implement a Rule to Redirect Completed Tasks to a “Completed” Section or Project:
Navigate to your project and click “Customize” in the top-right.
Go to your project and click on the “Customize” button in the top-right corner.
Under “Rules”, click on “Create a Rule”.
Trigger: Choose the trigger “Task completed”.
Action: Select the action “Move task to section” (or choose “Move task to project” if you prefer to send completed tasks to a different project).
You can create a new section named “Completed” in your project and use this action.
Optional: If you’d like to keep your board view tidy, you can choose to also “Remove from board” or set a rule to “Mark task as archived”.
Click Save.
2. Filter for Incomplete Tasks:
Once this rule is in place, you can filter your task view to only show incomplete tasks by:
Using the “Incomplete” filter option in your task list or board.
Sorting tasks by “Due Date” or “Priority” to highlight tasks that are still pending.
How to Archive Completed Tasks in Asana
Asana also supports archiving the tasks you’ve completed rather than throwing them away. Archiving helps you keep the tasks you have completed in view for future reference without consuming your working space.
Step-by-Step guide on archiving tasks
Open Your Project: Click on the project/task list containing the tasks you would like to archive.
Click on Project Name: Right in the top right corner of the project, click on the project name or the three dots beside it.
Choose Archive: Select “Archive Project” from the dropdown menu. This will archive the whole project, including completed work.
Asana will ask if you want to archive the project. Click OK, and the project will be archived.
View archived projects:
You can view archived projects at any time by going to your project sidebar and clicking on “Show Archived Projects.”
Archiving keeps your workspace tidy, and all task information is retained for later access.
When you restore archived tasks or projects, everything gets restored, so you can start working again or refer to them without any loss of data.
Managing your tasks efficiently in Asana is essential for productivity. Nobody wants a cluttered workspace that is full of distractions and unnecessary tasks. We hope you learned how to clean up your Asana workspace by reading this article to focus on more relevant tasks. Also, deleting tasks is ideal when you want to remove unnecessary clutter, but always remember that it is permanent. Restoring archived projects gives you the flexibility to bring back any task or project as needed.
Microsoft Planner and Asana are the most commonly used tools for delegating, tracking, and improving team collaboration.
Asana is one of the world’s most popular project management platforms, with more than 2.5 million weekly active users across the globe. Nonetheless, Microsoft Planner is a popular choice in the corporate sector, particularly in companies that already operate within the Microsoft ecosystem. Asana and Microsoft Planner may appear similar, but they serve different purposes.
Asana is better for team collaboration and complex project management, whereas Planner is ideal for users integrated into the Microsoft 365 suite.
We’ll discuss the pros and cons of Microsoft Planner vs Asana in this article, comparing the two in every aspect, including time management, integrations, customization, ease of use, and so on.
Pros and Cons of Asana and Microsoft Planner
Here’s a list of the pros and cons of Asana and Microsoft planners so you can decide which one better suits your needs.
Asana
Pros:
It has some of the most advanced and flexible task management features. For instance: “Task dependencies,” which Microsoft planner does not have.
Unlike Microsoft Planner, Asana offers multiple project views (they also included two new views called “workload views” and “Notes views.“)
Asana has extensive native integration outside of the Microsoft 365 suite, unlike the Planner.
It is highly customizable with custom fields, rules, forms, templates, and many more.
Cons:
This tool might be overwhelming for users unfamiliar with project management or task collaboration tools.
It gets expensive, especially for bigger teams and businesses.
Users have raised complaints about receiving an excessive number of email notifications from Asana (source)
Microsoft Planner:
Pros:
It seamlessly integrates with Microsoft apps like Outlook, Teams, and OneDrive.
Its simple and easy-to-use interface makes it ideal for teams needing a straightforward tool without too much setup or complexity.
It has great collaboration features across the Microsoft ecosystem.
It’s Cost-Effective compared to Asana. As it is free for users with a Microsoft 365 subscription, it’s an affordable solution for organizations already using Microsoft tools.
Cons:
It has limited advanced project management features to Asana.
It is less flexible compared to Asana when it comes to customizing workflows, views, or task details.
Poor integration with necessary third-party tools.
Is Asana better than Microsoft Planner?
Asana is better than Microsoft Planner if you have a large team or need to manage complex projects. It has advanced project management features, like task dependencies, Gantt charts, and Timeline views. On the other hand, Microsoft Planner is best suited for smaller teams or those already integrated into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.
Overview: Asana and Microsoft Planner
Before we get into the feature comparison, let’s get an idea of these tools.
Asana is a web-based collaboration and project management tool. It was commercially launched in April2012. Since then, it has made itself as a popular team collaboration software. With Asana, you can manage, collaborate, delegate tasks and projects within your team members.
On the other hand, Microsoft Planner is a project management software from Microsoft 365. Despite being relatively newly launched in 2017, it has become a preferable solution for companies due to its seamless integration with Microsoft 365 tools like Teams, Outlook, SharePoint, and OneDrive.
Core features comparison: Asana vs Microsoft Planner
Now let’s get into the most important part, which is; how does their core features compare with each other?
Task management features
Asana has advanced task management features like custom fields, task dependencies, multiple views (Timeline, Board, List), and rules for complex projects. It excels in task delegation, team collaboration, reporting, and workload management.
You can even create tasks in Asana via Email. Also one of the cool task management features about Asana that Microsoft planner lacks in is setting up recurring tasks.
You can set a task to recur on a specific day (e.g., every Monday) and even set up subtasks and dependencies in those recurring tasks.
Microsoft Planner, on the other hand, provides more straightforward task management features, including Kanban board view, due dates, and Microsoft 365 integration, which are ideal for less complex projects.
It is very easy to assign tasks and add files to tasks with Planner so that all relevant information is easily accessible.
Winner: Asana (due to its more advanced features)
Real-Time Team Collaboration and Updates
Both tools are updated in real-time, enabling employees to see what’s being done and where.
However, Asana also extends real-time collaboration to third-party connectors such as Slack, GoogleDrive, and Dropbox. This lets small teams collaborate across multiple platforms without switching applications.
With the support of attaching files and commenting on tasks, team members can improve communication and make everyone involved aware of what’s going on.
Microsoft Planner has the same functionality in the Microsoft ecosystem, which means that it can be incorporated with other Microsoft products like Teams, OneDrive, and Outlook. These native integrations may be better for your team if your team already lives in the Microsoft ecosystem.
Winner: Tie
Customizability
Asana has better customizability and flexibility than Microsoft Planner. With the “customize” button waiting right in the left corner, Teams can customize fields, templates, workflows, task views, create forms, and rules to suit their requirements.
Asana project customization options
Microsoft Planner, though it’s not as flexible as Asana, gives you all of the key tasks, such as the ability to build boards for various projects and set deadlines. It allows task assignments, due dates, labels, and checklist items but lacks advanced features like task dependencies or in-depth workflow customization.
Winner: Asana
Task delegation
In Asana, task delegation is both easy and flexible. You can assign tasks to team members, set task dependencies to define workflows, and ensure tasks are completed in the right order.
Additionally, the comment section on each task allows for real-time communication and collaboration, keeping all discussions and updates in one place, ensuring nothing gets lost in email chains or meetings.
Asana Task delegation features
Microsoft Planner does not have a built-in dependency feature. This makes Planner less suited for complex projects where tasks need to be completed in a specific sequence. However, Planner still allows for basic task delegation through assignment, due dates, and priorities, but lacks the flexibility of Asana’s advanced task sequencing.
Winner: Asana
Time Tracking
Asana has native time tracking features available in all its advanced and enterprise plans. However, if you want a free time tracking tool, you can integrate with Clockify. You can track task durations and set estimated times for tasks.
Microsoft Planner, by comparison, has no built-in time-tracking integrations but can still be used with Microsoft Power Automate to schedule updates or monitor progress via Power BI.
Planner is not geared toward complex time tracking, but it is great for teams already familiar with Microsoft tools and don’t require complex reporting functionality.
Winner: Asana
Ease of Use
While both are easy to use, Asana has a steeper learning curve than Microsoft Planner.
Asana’s design is sleek, and the onboarding process is fast so that small teams do not have to learn all the tricks along the way. It’s simple to create, assign, and manage tasks, and the ability to seamlessly switch between task modes such as list view, board view, and calendar view is quick and intuitive.
However, due to its advanced features, it can get complex for beginners, especially when transitioning from simpler tools.
Microsoft Planner on the other hand is pretty intuitive if you’re in a team familiar with the Microsoft platform. The interface is accessible to anyone who has worked with other Microsoft tools, and it is an easy add-on for businesses with Microsoft 365 accounts.
Microsoft Planner interface, Image from: Microsoft
Winner: Microsoft Planner
AI-driven project management features
Asana provides AI-powered features such as Smart Project Templates, Automation Workflows, and Task Prioritization with Workload insights to improve task management. It also applies machine learning to estimate task dates and shift times.
Microsoft recently integrated AI called Microsoft copilot into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, including Microsoft Planner. Copilot leverages OpenAI’s GPT to help users manage tasks, produce content, and automate workflow. However the AI-driven features of Planner with copilot is still basic and not as advanced as other AI-driven task management tools like Taskade.
However, When it comes to advanced AI features, both Asana and Microsoft Planner still lag behind platforms like Taskade or ClickUp.
Integration
Asana offers a wider range of integration options, connecting seamlessly with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams, among others.
Microsoft Planner, however, has tight integration with Microsoft 365 apps (Teams, Outlook, OneDrive), making it ideal for Microsoft-centric environments.
Workflow automation
Asana’s workflow automation is highly efficient, allowing you to build custom workflows with the Workflow Builder. One notable feature is Rules; for example, you can automatically assign tasks when a status changes or move tasks to different sections based on triggers.
Planner, on the other hand, requires integration with Power Automate for workflow automation. While it lacks built-in automation like Asana, Power Automate allows you to create custom workflows that can trigger actions across Microsoft 365 apps, such as task assignments or status updates in Planner.
Comparison summary: Asana vs Planner
Here’s a more concise comparison table with your requested formatting:
Microsoft Copilot: basic task management assistance
Time Tracking
Native (premium plans) or integrate with Clockify
No native tracking; use Power Automate for updates
Task Delegation
Flexible: assign tasks, set dependencies, add comments
Basic: task assignment only, no dependencies
Ease of Use
Steeper learning curve, intuitive for advanced users
Simple for teams familiar with Microsoft 365 tools
Pricing
Free, paid plans start at $10.99/month
Free with Microsoft 365, paid plans start at $6/user/month
Best For
Teams needing advanced project management & integrations
Teams within the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, simpler needs
Asana and Microsoft Planner: Pricing
Prices are a major consideration when comparing Asana and Microsoft Planner.
Asana has a Free Forever plan, Starter plan starts at $10.99 per month (if billed annually), and Advanced plan starts at $24.99 per month (if billed monthly).
Asana’s pricing structure is flexible, and users can increase or decrease based on team size and the amount of features they need. Yet the Premium and Business levels are prohibitively expensive for small teams or low-budget startups.
Microsoft Planner comes with the majority of Microsoft 365 (formerly Office 365) plans. Companies can utilize a range of productivity tools, such as Outlook, OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams, and Planner, depending on the subscription.
For instance, Microsoft 365 Business Basic comes at $6 per user/month, while Business Premium is $22 per user/month.
For small teams that already have Microsoft tools, Planner is a cost-effective option because you don’t need an additional separate subscription. But if your teams don’t use Microsoft 365, then Asana might be worth the price tag if they don’t have to fork over the cost of a full tooling package.
Who should use Asana?
Asana: Perfect for Teams that Want to be flexible and customizable.
Great for teams who need an advanced project management solution with customization features.
Works great for companies that track a large number of projects and have a wide variety of workflows.
Connects with third-party apps such as Slack, Google Drive, and Dropbox.
It’s ideal for teams that want to grow and automate workflows.
Who should use Microsoft Planner?
Microsoft Planner: Great for Groups Inside the Microsoft Ecosystem
Perfect for businesses that already have Microsoft 365 accounts and other Microsoft products such as Teams and Outlook.
Works best for groups that require an easy, low-cost task management platform.
Excellent for teams without a great deal of customization or complex project management tools such as Gantt charts.
Conclusion
Overall, Asana and Microsoft Planner are good tools for your job and which tool to choose primarily depends on the type of team you’re working with, the software stack you have, and how complicated the project is.
If your organization already runs on the Microsoft ecosystem, Planner might be the easiest and cheapest alternative. However, for small teams that want stronger customizability and workflow automation, Asana is still the king.
However, for small teams that require more robust customizability and workflow automation, Asana remains a top contender.
FAQ
Can Planner replace Asana?
Microsoft Planner can be a good alternative to Asana for small teams who need basic task management features and are already using Microsoft 365 subscriptions. However, it lacks the advanced features of Asana, such as Gantt charts and custom workflows, making it less suitable for larger or more complex projects.
What is Microsoft equivalent to Asana?
The closest Microsoft equivalent to Asana is Microsoft Planner. While Planner offers basic task and project management features, it lacks some of Asana’s advanced capabilities, such as workflow automation, Gantt charts, and time-tracking integrations.
Is there anything better than Asana?
It depends on your needs. If you require advanced project management tools with detailed reporting, Jira and Monday.com are excellent alternatives. However, Asana remains a strong choice for teams needing flexibility, ease of use, and a wide range of integrations.
Does Asana integrate with Microsoft Planner?
Asana does not directly integrate with Microsoft Planner, but both tools can be integrated with Microsoft Teams, which allows for easier collaboration between them. You can use third-party tools like Zapier to connect the two platforms if needed.
To create a template in Asana, go to the project >click on the dropdown beside the project name> select Save as a template.
Here, we will provide a step-by-step guide on how to create a new template in Asana as well as how to create a template for an existing project, how to share the template, where to find the customized template, as well as how to edit and update templates in Asana.
What Are Asana Templates?
Asana templates are built-in project frameworks that enable teams to kick off new projects with prebuilt tasks, timelines, and workflows. These templates save time by providing a point of departure for common actions or operations.
Rather than building a project from scratch each time, you can automate project management by creating an Asana template, keeping it consistent and speeding up the setup process.
How to create a template in Asana for an existing project:
Open the project that you would like to save as a template.
Click on the dropdown button next to the project name.
Choose “Save as Template” from the dropdown menu.
Give your template a descriptive name so that you can identify it.
Now, you can upload or print the template for your team whenever needed.
Click on the project you want to save as a template in Asana. Open your workspace and open the project window.
For this, I used the Cross-functional project, basically a default project in Asana.
Pro tip: Ensure all tasks are in the “To Do” section or have the default setup. This is important because if the tasks are in the “Doing” section, your template will reflect the same status, which may not be the desired setup.
Click on the dropdown next to the project name, then select “Save as template.”
You can then name your new template and modify the template’s privacy and accessibility. It’s as easy as that.
How to Create an Asana Template from scratch:
You can create a new Asana template by selecting “Blank Project” when starting a new project. After choosing the blank project option, set up your tasks, sections, and workflow as needed.
Once your project structure is ready, click the dropdown menu next to the project name and select “Save as Template”. This allows you to reuse the structure for future projects without starting from scratch.
Step 1: Access Your Asana Account.
Navigate to your Asana workspace where you’d like to design the template.
You need the proper permissions to create or edit projects in your workspace. You can save a project as a template if you’re an editor or admin.
Step 2: Create a New Project.
Navigate to the “New Project” link on the homepage or sidebar.
You can choose “Blank Project” or a pre-defined template if you prefer to begin with a ready-made layout.
When you want to start a new project, you can either start from scratch or use a template already created. Both will give you a chance to define a new template.
Click on the Plus icon on the upper left corner
Step 3: Configure the Project Information
Give your project a name that captures what you will use it for as a template (e.g., “Marketing Campaign Template”).
Select the view you want (list, board, or calendar).
Fill in any project-specific information you require, such as descriptions, dates, and recipients.
Step 4: Create Tasks and Sections
Publish tasks that are commonly used in your project workflow.
Sort tasks into categories (Select sections or columns). For instance, in a product launch template, you might have sections “Planning”, “Execution”, and “Review”.
Include job descriptions, assignees, due dates, and attachments if applicable.
Step 5: Add Custom Fields and Workflow
Customize your template even more by adding additional fields your team is likely to be using (e.g., priority, progress stage).
Create task dependencies and automate tasks in Asana to automate your workflow, such as assigning tasks or sending reminders when you’ve done something.
Step 6: Turn the Project into a Template.
Once you’ve crafted your project with all the tasks, sections and information you’ll need, it’s time to turn it into a template that can be reused.
Select the project name and click “Customize” (three dots).
Choose “Use as a Template”. This setting will create a template for your project structure, tasks, and workflows.
Where can you find the templates you’ve created in Asana?
In the left menu, press the “Search” bar and enter the name of the template or click on the “Templates” button.
Or, navigate to “Create” and click the Use template option.
When the “Use Template” option has been activated, click “My workspaces” and search your saved templates to find the template that you require.
Templates are pinned to your project list, which can be easily copied and shared.
How do you edit or update the templates in Asana?
For Asana template editing and revision, use these steps:
Head to the Team Members section and search for the template you wish to edit.
Click the three dots in the template’s box.
Click “Edit Project” to edit tasks, deadlines, sections, or people.
You can store the revised template for later reference once you have finished editing it.
How to share Asana Template?
Step 1:Navigate to the Template Project.
Open the project that you’ve saved as a template.
Step 2: Share the Template
You can open the project’s settings by clicking on the project name at the top.
Select the “Share” button to share it with other colleagues or partners.
– If you would like others to have access to the template, make sure to change the sharing mode to “Can Edit” if they have full permissions or “Can Comment” if they have limited access.
Step 3: Duplicate the Template
Users or collaborators can copy the template by choosing the “Duplicate Project” button on the project’s menu. This will produce a copy of the template that they can update as required.
Make sure to make the template visible to others via an external link to the template project or a shared team space.
Use case of Asana template.
Asana templates are ideal if you are working on a project where everything is exactly the same every time.
For instance, if you’re running weekly marketing campaigns, you can build a “Campaign Template” with features such as content creation, scheduling social media, and measuring results. Similarly, if you have client onboarding, a “Client Onboarding Template” might include contract signing, account creation, and training. Templates prevent you from reinventing the wheel and keep everything organized.
Asana templates are time-efficient and allow teams to standardize procedures and start projects immediately.
These are the quick and easy steps you can follow to create a template for yourself, share it with your colleagues and streamline your workflow. The flexibility in Asana means you can add sections, tasks, and automation to your templates to make them as effective as possible for subsequent work.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s)
Can you create a task template in Asana?
Yes, you can create a task template in Asana. To do this, create a task with all necessary details (assignee, due date, description). Once the task is set up, you can save it as a template by duplicating it. This allows you to reuse the task structure for future projects.
How do you create task templates in Asana?
To create task templates in Asana, open a project, add tasks with the necessary details (due dates, assignees, descriptions), and customize them to fit your workflow. Then, click the project dropdown and select “Save as Template”. This allows you to reuse the task structure for future projects.
How do you edit templates in Asana?
To edit templates in Asana, navigate to the Team Members section and locate the template you want to edit. Click on the three-dot menu next to the template and select “Edit Project”. Make the necessary changes to tasks, due dates, and assignees. After editing, save the updated template.
Creating a form in Asana is easy. To create a form in Asana, go to the relevant project, select customize>forms>add forms, then add or edit fields as needed. Then click on “save.”
What are Asana forms?
Asana forms collect information from users, such as team members or external collaborators. After that, the platform automatically turns those submissions into tasks for your Asana project.
Instead of manually entering new tasks into a project, you simply have to create a form in Asana. After that, when someone fills out a form, it’ll automatically turn into a task in the parent project.
You can simply use their drag-and-drop feature to include customizable fields, including text boxes, dropdowns, date pickers, and file uploads in your form.
After someone fills out a form, their responses automatically become a task, making it easy to track and manage everything in one place.
These forms help get information about project requests, feedback, bug reports, or event registrations.
Summary on How to make a Form in Asana
Go to your project and select Customize > Forms > Add Form to create a new form.
Add fields like Single Line Text, Dropdown, Date Picker, and File Upload to collect information.
Customize the fields and their options to suit your needs (e.g., task details, feedback).
Under Settings, assign default team members and copy answers to the task description.
Share the form link with users to collect responses directly into tasks.
Review form submissions, which automatically create tasks for easy management and tracking.
Below is a detailed step-by-step guide on how to create a form in Asana.
Step 1: Configure Your Project.
If you plan to create a form in Asana, first, you will need a project where forms appear as tasks. This project should match what you would want submissions to be about. For example, if you’re designing a form to take IT support tickets, ensure the project is dedicated to IT requests.
Step 2: Create the Form
Use the Form Builder:
In your project, click the “Customize” button in the top right corner and choose “Forms” from the menu. Then, click the “+ New Form” button to build your form.
Select the Customize buttonSelect forms
Add fields:
To add fields in the Asana form builder, you can easily drag and drop fields into your form. You can choose from the following field types:
Add fields on asana forms
Single Line Text: For single-line answers, such as a name or title.
Example: “Full Name” – Collecting the name of the person filling out the form.
Paragraph Text: For longer descriptions or explanations.
Example: “Project Description” – Gathering detailed information or explanations about a project.
Dropdown: To give users the possibility to select a set of choices.
Example: “Priority Level” – Users can choose from “Low”, “Medium”, or “High” to indicate the priority of a task.
Single Select: Allows users to choose only one option from a set of predefined options.
Example: “Task Status” – Users select the current status of a task, such as “Not Started”, “In Progress”, or “Completed”.
Multiple Select: Similar to the dropdown, users can select multiple options.
Example: “Skills Needed” – Users can select multiple skills such as “Design”, “Development”, “Marketing”, or “Research” that are required for a project.
Date Picker: Pick dates, such as due dates or scheduling preferences.
Example: “Due Date” – Users can pick a date to indicate the deadline for a task.
File Upload: This allows users to upload documents or images.
Example: “Upload Design Files” – Users can upload files related to their task or project, such as design documents or images.
Make Field Labels and Descriptions specific:
Be specific about field labels and descriptions. The more transparent your fields are, the more readily a submitter can input the necessary information. Give respondents guidance via assistance words or examples.
Configure Conditional Logic (Optional): If you want to deliver a fluid experience for form visitors, apply the conditional logic component. This allows you to reveal and hide fields based on a previous response from a respondent.
For example, if the user clicks on “Bug Report” as a reply, then the form may ask for further information about the bug type or severity.
Step 3: Configure Submission Settings
To add additional questions in Asana forms, follow these steps:
Click the Settings Tab: On the right sidebar, click the Settings tab.
Adjust Task Settings: Under this tab, you can adjust task settings, such as Selecting a default team member. Choose a default person to be assigned to each form submission.
Copying answers to the task description: You can opt to automatically copy all form responses into the task description for easy reference.
Form Settings: Below Form Settings, you can include a button that enables users to easily submit another form. This is useful if you want multiple submissions from the same person or team.
Copying answers to the task description: You can opt to automatically copy all form responses into the task description for easy reference.
Form Settings: Below Form Settings, you can include a button that enables users to easily submit another form. This is useful if you want multiple submissions from the same person or team.
Default Task Assignee: Select the default assignee for forms-generated tasks. You can either assign it to a project owner or leave it open until someone on the team receives it.
Rules engine Configuration: The Asana Rules engine can be configured to perform actions based on form submissions. You might, for instance, mark tasks automatically with the label of which task it is, delegate them to the appropriate user, or assign due dates based on the information contained in the form.
Personalize Notifications: Choose who will receive notifications when a form is submitted. You can send this notification to project members or create a workflow that notifies specific people based on what the submission is about (e.g. departments for various request types).
Step 4: Share Your Form
Once you’ve developed your form, send it out. Share the form link directly with external stakeholders, clients or employees. Here’s how to do it:
Obtain the Form Link: When you create your form, Asana generates a unique link that you can send out. You can email, embed this link in a site, or share it through chat systems.
Embed the Form: If you would like the form to be embedded on your organization’s intranet or website, Asana enables you to embed forms directly. This makes it easy for users to submit the form.
Reminder: Every form submission will show up as a tasks in the project of choice. These are completely automated, so you can monitor them and deal with submissions as they arrive.
Step 5: Review and Optimize
As with any tool, the only way to keep improving your forms is to constantly review them. Consider these:
Track Data Quality: Be sure that your form questions are asking the right questions. When answers are too vague, try to modify the questions or provide clearer prompts.
Modify Fields: As your processes change, so should your forms. Check your forms regularly for any changes to current business requirements and processes.
Analytics: If you’re getting a lot of responses, take advantage of Asana’s reporting tools to see how people are submitting forms. This can speed up your processes or uncover bottlenecks before they arise.
Use Cases for Asana Forms:
Task Collection from External Stakeholders: Use Asana forms to gather task details from clients, team members, or external collaborators without giving them full access to your project. For example, submitting project briefs, feedback, or feature requests.
Onboarding New Employees: You can automate the onboarding process by simply having new hires fill out forms. Tell them to submit necessary documents, preferences, and personal details, which then automatically create tasks in your project section.
Customer Feedback and Surveys: You can use forms to collect feedback from customers or users about your product or service.
Bug Reporting: Use a form to collect detailed bug reports, including issue descriptions, severity, and screenshots, which then create tasks for your dev team to resolve.
Event Registration: Use forms to collect details from event attendees (e.g., name, contact info, preferences), Which will automatically add them as tasks for your event management team.
Why Use Asana Forms?
Streamlined Data Collection: Forms simplify the process of gathering specific information and directly convert it into actionable tasks in Asana.
Customization: You can tailor forms with different question types (text, dropdowns, file uploads), making them adaptable to various business needs.
Automation: Form submissions automatically create tasks, saving time and reducing manual data entry.
Collaboration: Team members can easily view and manage tasks created through forms, ensuring efficient collaboration.
Transparency: Forms keep project workflows organized and transparent by having all necessary information collected in one place.
Cons of Asana Forms:
Limited Formatting Options: Asana forms are relatively simple and lack advanced customization, such as rich text or conditional logic in questions.
Limited Field Types: While Asana forms cover basic needs, they lack more advanced field types that some users might expect, like ratings or advanced multi-step forms.
No Email Notifications for Submissions: While Asana creates tasks from forms, it doesn’t automatically send notifications to form submitters, which is a downside if you need to keep them informed.
Dependence on Asana: To have access to the form, users first have to get access to Asana or access the task in Asana, where the form is hosted. This is not ideal for external users.
No file storage: While Asana forms allow users to upload files, Asana doesn’t provide full file storage capabilities. Uploaded files are only attached to the specific task created from the form submission, and these files are limited by Asana’s task attachment storage restrictions.
Overall, Asana form builder is a great tool for streamlining task creation and workflows. However, it’s not ideal for users who need to create highly complex or customizable forms. You can look for online form builders if you need more customization options in your form builder.
Both Motion and Asana provide powerful project management features. However, both are different in terms of the number of team members they are best suited for.
While Motion is better for AI automation and personal scheduling, Asana excels at managing team collaboration and complex projects.
In this article on “Motion vs Asana,” we’ll explore their key features and compare them in great detail while also figuring out their pros and cons.
What is the difference between Motion vs Asana?
The main difference is that Motion is a time management app that automates scheduling and task prioritization, while Asana helps teams collaborate, track progress, and organize tasks within a project-focused environment.
Brief Overview of Motion and Asana:
Let’s take a brief look at Motion and Asana, comparing their core features to gain a better understanding of their differences.
Motion: AI-driven scheduling automation tool
Motion stands out with its AI-based automation of tasks. The system automates prioritization and scheduling by using artificial intelligence. It automates the scheduling of activities according to priority, urgency, and timeframe.
This makes it ideal for small teams or individuals who don’t want to invest hours in manual task management and spend them instead on execution.
The AI meeting assistant is one of its specialties. It acts as a personal AI assistant that handles your meeting schedules for you. Motion also claims to automate 90% of project planning with their AI project management tools.
If Your team has less than 50 members, Motion is the way to go.
Asana: Intuitive Project Tracking and Collaboration.
In contrast, Asana is best at coordinating teams and tracking projects. It’s one of the most widely used project management software and provides a comprehensive suite of tools to manage tasks and projects across a wide variety of team members.
Asana is a teamwork app that can bring people together in real-time by offering task comments, attachments, and integrations with Google Calendar and third-party apps.
Asana excels in providing detailed reports, customizable dashboards, and advanced project-tracking tools like Gantt charts and timeline views.
If reporting, accountability of team members, and tracking progress are crucial for your workflow, Asana is the better choice. Asana is more of a project management software for large teams, unlike Motion.
Motion is more suited for AI Automation and Personal Scheduling than Asana. Its AI-powered task management and intelligent scheduling give small teams or individuals who want to automate everything an edge.
Whereas Asana requires manual scheduling or integrations, Motion’s AI will automatically reschedule tasks based on meeting time, preventing conflicts and maximizing productivity.
It is updated in real-time from your input without requiring you to update it manually. It is the only app that focuses on individual productivity control.
Overall, Motion is helpful for teams that don’t need to rely heavily on detailed reporting or project management. Its simple interface and AI-assisted task delegating keep users productive without letting their Workload overwhelm them.
What Asana does better than Motion:
Asana is Better for Team Work & High-Throughput Projects
Asana, on the other hand, is ideally suited for environments where collaboration is needed at all times. It is seamlessly integrates with various other tools, such as Google Calendar, Slack, and other project management tools, making it an integrated solution for larger teams.
Its Gantt chart and timeline views enable project managers to quickly visualize project progress, due dates, and dependencies across tasks.
If you have a team that requires precise task management and project management with workflow control, Asana beats Motion.
Pros and Cons of Motion and Asana
Motion pros:
Automates scheduling and task prioritization for efficient time management.
Personal productivity app with Google Calendar integration.
Small groups or individuals will love this product.
Asana Pros: List of things I liked after using Asana.
Prompt project management with tasking, dates, and collaborations.
Flexible workflows, integrations, and scalability for teams of any size.
Core features available on free plan.
You can easily create and customize your own rule.
Asana is highly customizable, with forms, rules, customizable timelines, and many more.
Cons:
There is a high learning curve due to its advanced features.
There are minimal reporting features, especially on the free plan.
It is not geared towards time management and scheduling.
Key Feature Comparison of Motion and Asana
Here’s a closer look at how Motion and Asana compare in certain areas.
Ease of use and user interface
Motion is definitely easier to use, especially for individuals and small teams who want a streamlined, intuitive approach to task management. Tasks are color-coded by priority or project, giving you a visual cue to distinguish between different types of work.
The Motioncalendar also has an user friendly interface, without the clutter of overly complex features. The focus is on ease of use and streamlining your workflow rather than overwhelming you with options.
If you are looking for an easy to use task management app that works like Motion, read our comparison on “Sunsama vs Motion.”
Asana, on the other hand, is a bit more complex than Motion. Due to all the features and options, it sometimes feels cluttered. And there’s a steep learning curve for beginners.
If you are entirely new to the world of project management tools, you might end up saying, “Oh, there’s so much going on here.”
However, it’s justified by the flexibility it offers with all those advanced features. Once you get familiar with the platform, you’ll appreciate its depth and customization, especially for managing more significant projects.
Winner: Motion
Automation
Motion is excellent at delegating work through AI-based workflows, which makes it a good choice for users who want their schedules to change on the fly.
However, While Motion offers strong AI-powered task scheduling and automation for personal productivity, its automation features are more focused on scheduling rather than workflow automation.
Asana’s automation features, on the other hand, are more advanced and versatile, especially for team collaboration and complex projects.
It’s really good at generating highly customized automated workflows based on rules. You can easily design your own rule; for example, If a task is due (trigger), assign it to user 2 (action).
This flexibility allows team members or users to create highly complex and customizable workflow automation.
Winner: Asana
AI features:
Motion excels at AI-driven task management features. Automatically prioritizing and scheduling tasks based on urgency and deadlines, making it ideal for individuals or small teams. Unlike other tools focused solely on meeting scheduling, such as Motion vs Reclaim, Motion offers a suite of features including an AI meeting assistant, an AI project manager, an AI calendar, an AI task manager—you name it!
Most users of Motion like how Motion’s AI removes the complexity of manual task management.
Asana, on the other hand, does not have AI-driven features like task prioritization or automatic scheduling, which are found in some other project management tools. Users have to manually manage task priorities and timelines.
It lacks the smart automation that AI-powered tools like Motion offers.
Winner: Motion
Which tool is best for task management: Motion or Asana?
Motion is an AI-powered task management tool that automatically schedules and prioritizes tasks, adjusting dynamically to your availability and deadlines. It’s ideal for individuals or small teams who want a simple, automated solution to manage their time and tasks.
Asana, on the other hand, is ideal for team task collaboration. It offers multiple customizable views, advanced workflow automation with customizable views, and, most importantly, task dependencies.
You can make tasks dependent on each other, for example, “keyword research is not complete” and then “article writing can’t start.” It really comes in handy in the case of complex workflows where you have to make sure nothing gets overlooked.
Asana’s customizable rule
These advanced features make Asana more suitable as a task management tool for large teams, unlike Motions, which is more of an AI-driven task and scheduling assistant for personal productivity or small teams.
So, if you ask us, the winner in terms of task management would be Asana due to its advanced features and flexibility.
Motion shines at Calendar management due to its AI-powered scheduling that automatically prioritizes and organizes tasks based on deadlines and availability. Unlike other tools like Motion vs Notion, this means you don’t have to worry about managing your calendar manually—the calendar itself adjusts and optimizes your schedule in real time.
This means you don’t have to worry about managing your calendar manually—the calendar itself adjusts and optimizes your schedule in real time.
Each day, I didn’t know exactly what I should do next. Now Motion picks that for me. I never have to open a list, scan through 20 items, and pick what I do. I just look at my calendar.
Juan Pablo Sarmiento
Director of Engineering, Zenysis Technologies
While Asana provides Calendar views, which allow users to see tasks and deadlines in a visual format, it requires more manual input to organize and prioritize tasks. Users have to manually adjust schedules and task dependencies.
Asana calendar view
Winner: Motion
Planning
If we’re comparing from a daily planner perspective, Motion is better due to its automated calendar, which seamlessly prioritizes and schedules tasks based on deadlines and availability, reducing manual effort. However, it’s not as easy to use or intuitive for simple daily planning automation like that of Flowsavvy vs Motion
However, for project planning, Asana excels with its customizable timelines, task dependencies, and collaboration tools, giving you more manual control over complex workflows and team coordination. While Motion simplifies personal task management, Asana provides greater flexibility for managing larger, team-based projects.
Winner: It is a tie
Reporting features
Compared to other project management tools like Asana or Monday.com, Motions reporting features are relatively basic. It does provide an overview of task completion and progress but lacks advanced analytics or customizable reporting options.
Asana, on the other hand, has advancedreporting and analytics for project management. You can create your reporting dashboard with pre-made templates from the library, or you can customize it yourself.
There’s also progress tracking and generating detailed reports on various metrics like team performance, task completion, project milestones, and timelines. There are also multiple views to visualize the progress of the project.
So, if reporting is a key priority for your team, Asana is definitely a better choice than Motion.
Winner: Asana
Team collaboration tools
Motion have basic team collaboration tools. You can assign tasks to team members, set due dates, and attach files to tasks. They also provide some basic views on the progress of the tasks.
Motion is more of an Ai scheduling assistant than collaboration tool between large teams like that of Taskade vs ClickUp.
However, they are not as detailed as Asana. Motion is more of a collaboration tool for small teams.
Asana offers more advanced team collaboration tools such as team conversations, project-level discussions, and team-specific workspaces. It also allows real-time collaboration on tasks, with tools like @mentions and threaded comments for seamless communication.
Asana’s task dependencies and milestones make it easier for teams to collaborate on complex projects, keeping track of who needs to complete what and by when.
So, if you want a collaboration tool for project management, go with Asana.
Integration
Asana provides extensive integrations with 100+ tools, including Slack, Google Drive, Trello, and Zoom, to allow for advanced time-tracking, reporting, and collaboration. Third-party apps such as Toggl and Harvest for real-time monitoring are also supported.
Motions, on the other hand, have fewer integrations. Although it provides basic integrations for task tracking, it lacks the depth seen in Asana.
Motion integrates with various tools like your email, calendar, and other tools needed for basic project management, which would be enough if you require basic integration.
Winner: Asana
Resource Management
Motions provide basic resource management features like task allocation and a quick snapshot of progress but no capacity planning, reporting, or forecasting.
It provides a minimalistic solution that is appropriate for smaller teams or simpler initiatives.
Asana, on the other hand, is great for resource management with features such as Workload to monitor team size, dependencies, and real-time reports. It offers more flexible resource allocation, including custom fields for tracking time, budget, and task status.
Asana’s robust integration support also provides rich resource management and forecasting functionality for larger, more advanced projects.
Winner: Asana
Pricing: Motion and Asana
Motion Pricing: Motion doesn’t provide a free plan, which is a downside for smaller teams or low-budget users. They only provide a free trial of 14 days.
Motion is a subscription model whereby various tiers grant AI-powered benefits as you expand. Though not offered as a free option, its premium features, such as task automation, AI scheduling, and meeting management, are designed specifically for people seeking high-level productivity support.
The individual plan starts at $19 per month, and the Business standard plan starts at $12 per month ( supports teams of less than 20 users.)
Motion pricing
Asana Price: Asana, however, has a very strong free plan, perfect for teams that need only to keep track of tasks, deliverables, and basic team tools.
Asana offers a free version that comes with minimal task management functionality and is suitable for small teams or individuals. Its premium and business plans scale by number of employees, and it offers additional tools such as custom fields, Gantt charts, and reporting.
The personal plan is completely free, the starter plan is $10.99 per month (if billed annually), and the advanced plan is $24.99 per month (if billed annually).
Asana pricing
Overall, Whether Asana is more cost-effective depends on the specific needs and size of your team. Here’s a comparison based on typical scenarios:
Asana Cost-Effectiveness:
Free Plan: Asana offers a generous free plan for small teams with basic features, including task management, project views, and limited reporting.
Paid Plans: Asana’s Premium and Business plans come with advanced features like Workload, Timeline, and Reporting, making them ideal for larger teams or more complex projects. Pricing is competitive, especially considering the robust set of features it offers.
Integrations: Asana’s wide range of integrations with time tracking, CRM, and communication tools can enhance its cost-effectiveness by streamlining workflows.
Motions Cost-Effectiveness:
Simplicity: Motions are a more affordable choice for smaller teams or those needing basic task management and collaboration tools. It can be more cost-effective for teams that don’t need extensive features or advanced resource management.
Limitations: However, for teams requiring more advanced reporting, time tracking, or resource management, Motions may fall short, meaning additional third-party tools or upgrades would be needed, which can increase costs.
Comparison summary
Feature
Motion
Asana
Strength
AI-driven automation, scheduling
Team collaboration, project tracking
Best For
Small teams, personal productivity
Large teams, complex projects
AI
Task scheduling and prioritization
Lacks AI-driven task management
Task Management
Dynamic, automated scheduling
Advanced task management with dependencies
Ease of Use
Simple, intuitive interface
Steeper learning curve, customizable
Calendar
AI-powered scheduling
Manual adjustments, limited automation
Collaboration
Basic for small teams
Advanced features for team collaboration
Reporting
Basic progress tracking
Advanced reports, customizable dashboards
Integrations
Limited integrations
100+ integrations
Resource Management
Basic task allocation
Advanced resource tracking and forecasting
Pricing
Starts at $12/month, no free plan
Free plan available, paid plans from $10.99/month
Scalability
Best for small teams (<50 members)
Scalable for large teams and complex projects
The Verdict: Motion or Asana?
Motion: Great for Work-at-Home Automation and Artificial Intelligence Scheduling.
Motion is designed for small teams or people who want AI-powered scheduling and task automation. It is ideal for people who require a simple user interface that blends seamlessly into their daily schedule, with tasks scheduled and adjusted on a priority-based basis.
If you’re looking to maximize your own productivity, Motion’s AI is a great resource.
Asana: For Team Communication and Hard-to-Keep-Track Projects.
For larger teams or complex projects, Asana is your solution. Its integrated project management tools — including Gantt charts, custom workflows, and timeline views — provide all the functionality you need for real-time collaboration and detailed project management. If you have multiple projects in your hand and have a huge team, Asana will give you the tools and the agility to organize everything.
Conclusion
Motion and Asana are equally good at task and project management. If you are looking for an AI-driven messaging and task automation solution for yourself or a small team, Motion is the best one. But if your team needs real-time collaboration, custom project tracking, and reporting, Asana is the right tool for complicated projects and growing teams.
Depending on your team size, project scope, and feature requirements, you’ll be better prepared to make a better choice between these two powerful project management platforms.
Motion uses AI to automatically schedule tasks, optimizing team capacity and deadlines. Unlike Asana, which requires manual task assignments and adjustments, Motion’s focus is on automation and smart resource allocation, making it ideal for teams seeking efficient time management without heavy manual intervention.
Does the Motion app work with Asana?
Motion does not natively integrate with Asana. While both tools manage tasks and projects, they operate separately. Integration is only possible through third-party tools like Zapier, but it is not a built-in feature.
Is there a Microsoft equivalent to Asana?
Yes, Microsoft Planner is a strong alternative to Asana. It offers task management, team collaboration, and progress tracking within the Microsoft 365 suite. While simpler, it provides similar functionality for managing tasks and projects, especially for teams already using Microsoft tools.
Motion is effective for project management, particularly for teams seeking AI-driven automation for task scheduling and resource optimization. While great for smaller teams or simpler projects, larger or more complex projects may benefit from traditional tools like Asana, which offer more customization and control.
Taskade and ClickUp are two of the most popular Task management tools. Both provide the same features of task tracking and project management, but they cater to a slightly different set of users and workflows.
While Taskade is known for its user-friendly, minimalistic design, ClickUp offers a more comprehensive and customizable solution. It’s especially useful for team members.
With this comparison, let’s break down what makes each tool better than the other, what’s unique about each, and how to choose which is right for you. We’ll discuss the key features, pros and cons, and pricing of both tools.
So, let’s dive in!
Overview of Taskade
Taskade is a simple yet powerful AI task-and-collaboration productivity app. It offers a straightforward, modern interface that integrates several workflows, including to-do lists, mind maps, and Kanban boards.
It makes project management, real-time syncing, delegation, and collaboration across teams easy with a single interface.
This AI tool not only lets users create task lists, collaborate with team members in real time, and maintain notes but also helps users brainstorm ideas and turn brain dumps into actionable ideas.
Taskade uses GPT 4, which can assist in generating content for projects, making meeting notes, or brainstorming ideas. For example, if you’re starting a new project, the AI can help write outlines, suggest templates, and even generate content for documents.
Task Lists & To-Dos: Taskade’s core features revolve around creating tasks, to-do lists, and quick task prioritization.
Mind Mapping: The company also provides mind maps, enabling you to visualize your ideas in a visual way, and can be used for brainstorming.
Kanban Boards: It also offers Kanban boards to help those who would like a more visual approach to managing projects.
Templates: Taskade provides pre-built templates for different workflows, which makes it simple to install and use with little setup.
Team Communication — You can collaborate with your team in real time, which is important for remote teams or for those who require frequent updates.
Customized AI Agents: Taskade offers customized AI agents that you can integrate with your team. These AI agents, powered by GPT-4, can be tailored to suit your unique workflow and project needs.
Pros of Taskade:
The interface is easy to navigate and is great for individuals or small groups.
A strong emphasis on organization and self-improvement.
It is great For lightweight project administration with intuitive templates.
Great for a group that wants simple collaboration and real-time data.
Its interface is fun and appealing to look at.
It’s a great option if you are looking for a free AI assistant.
Cons of Taskade:
Lack of feature richness as compared to bigger, more Comprehensive platforms like Clickup, for instance.
It gets slower as you include more documents in tasks. (source)
More suited for simple task management than sophisticated project management.
Not as well integrated with some of the more comprehensive project management platforms.
If you want to look for other alternatives to Taskade, read our article about “Taskade alternatives.”
Overview of ClickUp
ClickUp is a powerful project collaboration tool designed to support teams of all sizes, from small startups to large enterprises.
Taskade, on the other hand, is more suited for individuals or smaller teams looking for a simple and intuitive task management experience.
ClickUp is an extensible, fully customizable platform that offers everything from project tracking to project timelines, reporting, and team coordination.
It serves small and large organizations with advanced automation, integration, and workflow management features.
What people really like about Clickup is its high customizability, which allows you to turn it into almost anything you need.
Whether you’re looking for a project management tool, a CRM system, or a help desk, ClickUp has you covered.
Task Management: ClickUp lets you build tasks, subtasks, and deadlines that are prioritized by the user.
Custom views: It comes with custom views like List View, Board View, Calendar View, Gantt Chart View, etc., which gives users flexibility in how they see their work.
Time Tracking: Built-in time tracking allows you to track how long you spent on each task, giving you an insight into your productivity.
Integrations: ClickUp connects with a large variety of tools such as Slack, Google Drive, Zoom, GitHub, and more to help teams streamline their workflows.
Documents & Wikis: ClickUp has built-in documentation and wikis, so teams can build knowledge bases and share documents directly within the platform.
Goals & OKRs: You can define and execute goals and objectives in ClickUp, linking day-to-day activities to long-term strategic actions.
Reporting & Dashboards: ClickUp offers customized dashboards and reports that can be utilized to measure progress and performance in real time.
Pros of ClickUp:
Easily extendable to support multiple use cases and workflows.
All-in-one for managing tasks, projects, documents, and goals.
Supports advanced project management workflows such as Gantt charts and time logging.
Complete integrations with third-party apps and tools.
It’s highly customizable.
ClickUp has a free forever plan.
Does not get slow often, unlike Taskade.
Cons of ClickUp:
Higher learning curve thanks to its feature range.
It’s a lot to take in for smaller teams or people who don’t necessarily need all the advanced features.
Sometimes, it is way too complicated for basic task management.
A bit messy to handle if not properly planned out because of all the options available.
Key feature comparison: What Is the Difference Between Taskade And ClickUp?
1. Task Management Features:
ClickUp
They both provide the ability to create, assign, and track tasks, but ClickUp takes it even further with time tracking, dependencies, and reporting options. If you have a multi-project team, ClickUp’s Gantt charts and resource capabilities make all the difference.
ClickUp task management features
You can ask AI to create subtasks for you, put priority flags, track time, and many more. Most importantly, you can add dependencies, where you can include “tasks that need to be completed before this task,” “tasks that can’t start until another one is completed,” and “tasks that relate to each other.” This will show up in the relationship sector of the task.
Clickup dependency
Taskade
Taskade has task lists, mind maps, and Kanban boards that are perfect for doing mundane tasks. It doesn’t support the deep capabilities of ClickUp to help you organize complex projects, like task dependencies, custom task statuses, and team capacity management.
Taskade is better at simplifying the task management process, especially for team members.
Taskade project management
2. Focus and Complexity:
Taskade is minimalistic in nature. It’s great for anyone looking for a lightweight, minimal task/project management tool. It offers an intuitive user experience, while sticking to primary productivity tools — making it a good choice for single people and small teams who don’t need a super-rich platform.
ClickUp, in contrast, is a robust project management tool that has powerful capabilities for large teams, complicated workflows, and businesses of any size.
It is highly customizable, which makes it more suited for businesses that need something beyond task management.
3. Project Views
ClickUp offers 16 views, which is more than Taskade, providing users with a variety of ways to visualize their work. These include options like Form view, Dashboard view, Workload view, Whiteboard view, and many more.
ClickUp views
On the other hand, Taskade has six views, focusing on a simpler, more streamlined approach with fewer views, making it ideal for users who prioritize ease of use over complex customization. It has
Taskade Mindmap View
4. Mind Maps
Taskade: Taskade’s Mind Maps are quick, visual, and easy to navigate. You can create nodes and drag-and-drop to organize them, quickly turning concepts into tasks.
The Mind Map provides a simple, minimalistic interface, ideal for low-tech brainstorming or high-level project management.
What we liked most is that you can use AI to create auto-generated mind maps using prompts. It’s so easy you don’t have to jump into advanced settings or setups.
Taskade mind map
Yet, it doesn’t support task dependencies or advanced customizations, making it unfit for detailed project planning.
ClickUp: ClickUp’s Mind Maps are much more organized and feature-rich. Nodes can become custom fields, assignees, and due dates — fully integrated into ClickUp’s complete project management toolkit.
It offers virtual whiteboards, which you can use to create mindmaps with your remote team. You can sort tasks (e.g., List or Gantt view), manage dependencies, and handle large-scale projects more efficiently.
ClickUp mind map
You can even add images and links to your whiteboards. It’s great for teams that want to visualize and track tasks in detail but is more setup-intensive and steeper in the learning curve.
In terms of Mind Map, Clickup is the clear winner.
5. AI Features
Taskade: Taskade excels at AI features in the areas of productivity improvement and content production.
Here’s a list of things you can do with its AI features:
Generate high-quality content with their AI writing Assistant.
Summarize any type of documents, YouTube videos, and web pages.
Create and deploy custom AI agents to automate activities like research, content creation, and many more.
Create automated Mind Maps using prompts.
The AI algorithms on the platform are specifically built to automate tasks. It automatically creates overviews, proposes task lists, and provides smart automation for your workflows.
A brief list of things Taskade AI can do
ClickUp: You can use ClickUp’s AI, also known as ClickUp Brain, but they’re automating and analyzing data more than producing content.
The AI assistant supports task grouping, project forecasting, and automating repetitive tasks such as task delegation or scheduling. Although great for large teams requiring a complex workflow, ClickUp’s AI is not as fast or inventive as Taskade’s AI.
It’s not about creativity or helping with day-to-day writing and content creation but rather streamlining data-driven workflows. For teams that require extreme automation and insights, ClickUp’s AI is good.
However, Taskade’s AI wins for its interactive nature, which is designed to work closely with users to streamline tasks and assist with creative workflows.
6. Docs
Taskade’s Docs are sleek, minimalistic, and designed for fast collaboration. Tasks are embedded in your documents, making them instantly usable.
It does not offer many rich formatting features, but its integration with tasks and projects makes it a fantastic tool for teams that need basic project descriptions or meeting notes.
The live communication is lightning-fast and incredibly easy, and its minimalist design means users need not have a great deal of difficulty getting up and running.
ClickUp Docs is an enhanced documentation solution. You can build documents with more complicated presentation options (tables, images, checklists, etc. ), and documents are natively linked to ClickUp tasks, which means you can assign, prioritize, and manage tasks directly from the doc.
For teams who require complex project documentation, ClickUp is more advanced.
7. Customization:
ClickUp offers more customization flexibility. You can define your own task fields, develop custom workflows, and configure automated actions. The open architecture of ClickUp means teams can customize the platform to fit their needs.
You can create custom project dashboards with 50+ widgets and 15+ views, providing a highly customized workspace.
Taskade, on the other hand, is easier and doesn’t allow for nearly as much flexibility. However, it shines at providing pre-built templates. It offers 500+ productivity templates across various categories.
8. Collaboration:
ClickUp provides basic collaboration features such as sharing documents, comments, mentions, and tasks. But its extra-curricular options are intimidating when it comes to teams just tracking mundane activities.
Taskade excels at real-time collaboration, especially in remote teams. The dashboard is intuitive, and team members can easily add tasks, leave comments, and report progress without the steep learning curve.
It also supports streamlined sharing so that you can collaborate live. They also have a built-in option for meetings via video call.
9. Automation and Integrations:
ClickUp is an automation and integration powerhouse. It connects to more than 1,000 third-party applications and offers advanced automation such as task creation, status updates, and notifications. It is ideal for teams that want to automate processes and eliminate human errors.
Taskade has some necessary integrations with services such as GoogleDrive and Slack, but its automation options are considerably less extensive than ClickUp. Taskade might be enough if all you need is a simple task manager that doesn’t over-automate anything.
10. User Experience and Learning Curve:
ClickUp is challenging to learn because of its extensive functionality. Despite all its customization and extensibility, it can be intimidating to a new user, especially one who doesn’t necessarily need all of the bells and whistles.
Taskade wins here; its interface is clean and easy to understand. The app is incredibly user-friendly and ideal for people or teams who are looking for an easy, short-cut way to track tasks. Its colorful and easy-to-use interface makes it stand out among all the other task management apps.
Taskade interface
Pricing: Taskade and ClickUp
Taskade has a minimal-featured free version, ideal for individuals or small teams. Paid versions are reasonable in cost; the Pro plan starts at $8 per month, and the team plan starts at $32 (if billed annually) per month and comes with premium features such as additional templates, integrations, and unlimited projects.
ClickUp comes in a free forever version that packs most of the basics. But if you want ClickUp’s sophisticated features, such as time tracking, Gantt charts, and custom dashboards, you’ll have to sign up for a paid plan. The unlimited plan starts at $7, and the Business plan starts at $12(if billed annually) per month.
Comparison summary of ClickUp and Taskade
Here is a comparison table between Taskade and ClickUp:
Feature
Taskade
ClickUp
Overview
Simple AI task and collaboration app for small teams.
Comprehensive, customizable project management tool for larger teams.
Key Focus
Minimalistic task management and real-time collaboration.
Robust project management, automation, and team coordination.
Task Management
Task lists, mind maps, Kanban boards.
Tasks, subtasks, dependencies, Gantt charts.
Views
6 views
16 views
Customization
Limited customization, focuses on templates.
Highly customizable workflows, dashboards, and widgets.
AI Features
GPT-4 powered AI agents for content generation.
Basic AI integrations for task automation.
Collaboration
Real-time collaboration, video calls.
Basic collaboration with advanced options for teams.
Integrations
Google Drive, Slack, and other necessary platforms.
1,000+ integrations (Slack, Google Drive, Zoom, etc.).
Automation
Basic task automation.
Advanced automation (task creation, status updates, etc.).
Time Tracking
Not available.
Built-in time tracking and productivity insights.
Ratings (Capterra/G2)
4.7/4.6
4.6/4.7
Pricing
Free with basic features; paid plans start at $8/month.
Free plan available; paid plans start at $7/month.
Best For
Small teams or individuals needing simplicity.
Larger teams with complex project management needs.
This table highlights the key differences between Taskade and ClickUp, helping you choose based on your team’s specific needs and project complexity.
Which One Should You Choose? Taskade vs CLickUp
Choose Taskade if:
You want a simple, user-friendly task manager for your own or small group tasks.
You only want to manage task lists and schedules and collaborate in real-time — without the need for extra functionality.
You want a clean design and simple templates to quickly organize tasks.
You don’t need much in the way of third-party integrations and automation.
Choose ClickUp if:
You need a stronger project management tool that can evolve with your team and business.
You’ll need advanced features such as Gantt charts, time tracking, task dependencies, and automation.
You have complex projects, and you need the ability to personalize workflows for your team.
You need integrations with all sorts of third-party tools and applications.
You’re ready to take the time to train on a better project and team management system.
Conclusion
Taskade and ClickUp are great tools, but they have different uses. Taskade is a light and simple task manager designed for individuals or small teams that require simple workflow and collaboration.
ClickUp is a more robust and flexible platform designed for larger teams or organizations that have a more sophisticated workflow that requires task management, automation, and integration.
Taskade is a productivity and task management software that allows teams to work together, schedule processes, and manage projects. It provides customizable task lists, project templates, team sharing, and goal tracking, so it’s perfect for both individuals and teams to stay organized and productive.
Does Taskade have a Chrome extension?
Yes, Taskade has a Chrome extension that lets you quickly view and organize your tasks in the browser. The extension integrates directly with the web app so you can create, update, and manage tasks, as well as share them with colleagues wherever you go.
Why is ClickUp so popular?
The popularity of ClickUp stems from its project management solution, where tasks, time, goals, and document sharing are all accessed from the same space. It has great customizability, cross-tool integration, and automation that will appeal to teams of all types across multiple industries.
What can I do with Taskade?
Taskade allows you to build tasks, track projects, create goals, and collaborate with your team in real-time. It has multiple workflow templates, making it simple to plan projects, delegate work, and monitor execution. Taskade, too, provides a minimal and user-friendly interface for increasing productivity.
Is ClickUp AI ChatGPT?
No, ClickUp does not use ChatGPT exclusively. While ClickUp employs AI for automation, task recommendation, and workflow optimization, it doesn’t directly integrate ChatGPT. ClickUp AI helps with project management, while ChatGPT is a conversational AI framework that generates text.
If you are looking for the best ADHD planner app for your day-to-day task management, you are in the right place.
People with ADHD usually have difficulty maintaining attention, especially on tasks that are repetitive, uninteresting, or require sustained effort, resulting in stress due to not getting things done, which becomes a loop of procrastination, guilt, and frustration.
But don’t worry; in this article, we’ll explore the best ADHD planner apps, including Flowsavvy, Neurolist, Comigo, Sunsama, SkedPal, BeforeSunset AI, Todoist, TickTick and Goblin.
These apps offer solutions such as ADHD AI assistance, task breakdowns, personalized reminders and many more.
Flowsavvy: The Best Time Blocking app for ADHD
Flowsavvyis one of the best time management apps for ADHD. It is an automated scheduling and time-blocking app that intelligently allocates the optimal time slots for your tasks and events.
Flowsavvy automatically schedules tasks and events into time blocks in your Calendar. You just have to enter tasks with priority, deadlines, and duration, and Flowsavvy will handle the rest.
This intelligent scheduling app also offers a workload management feature to help you spread tasks evenly across your schedule.
And the best part? Compared to other scheduling apps (like Motion vs Flowsavvy) that are overwhelmed with unnecessary features, Flowsavvy is super simple.
Additionally, this app’s smart scheduling ensures that your Calendar automatically adapts to your workload, reducing stress and procrastination.
Key Features of Flowsavvy
Automated scheduling: Flowsavvy will automatically schedule your tasks and events in your Calendar based on priority, deadlines, time estimations, and your preferences for scheduling.
Workload Distribution: This unique feature of Flowsavvy lets you choose between evenly distributing tasks throughout your day (balanced schedule) or prioritizing and front-loading high-priority tasks.
Dynamic Time Blocking: The “Recalculate” feature of Flowsavvy automatically adjusts your time blocks when tasks change or deadlines shift. You can easily reschedule your entire Calendar with a single click.
To-do list management: You can create a to-do list, and Flowsavvy will automatically schedule them in your time-blocked Calendar. (check out Flowsavvy vs SkedPal for more extensive to-do list management)
Why Flowsavvy is a Great Planner App for ADHD:
Flowsavvy offers workload distribution to spread tasks evenly across your work hours, which helps ADHD users stay on track without feeling overwhelmed.
Flowsavvy offers great flexibility to manually drag-and-drop time blocks even though it’s an automated scheduling app. Plus, this app is really intuitive and has a simple user interface.
You can learn more about this Time-blocking app in this detailed Flowsavvy review. 😊
Neurolist: AI-Driven Task Management for ADHD
Neurolist is an AI daily planner dedicated to neurodivergent productivity. It stands out for its ability to break down tasks into smaller, more manageable parts, preventing the feeling of overwhelm that often accompanies ADHD.
This app uses AI to break down stressful tasks into smaller tasks. This app is like an AI list maker for ADHD. Neurolist also integrates Pomodoro timers and focus mode to keep you on track of tasks that need to get done.
Via: Neurolist in Playstore
One great thing about Neurolist is how it personalizes your planner by using context, so the AI gets better at understanding your scheduling preferences over Time.
Oh! Here’s another cool feature of this daily planner app: Neurolist can take voice commands and automatically convert them into tasks, which saves a lot of Time.
Additionally, it provides priority-based task management and intelligent reminders, ensuring you stay on top of your to-do lists without missing deadlines.
Key Features of Neurolist
Task Division: You just have to write down what you need to get done. This app will give you an estimated time for the task (you can change it). After that, it’ll divide the work into smaller steps with the estimated Time for each. You can also ask the AI How you want to edit the list of the subtasks.
Setting Alerts: Users receive deadline-relevant reminders and customizable reminders based on their schedules whenever they need them. You can also add a persistent reminder that keeps buzzing until you acknowledge them.
Pomodoro session: Focus Improvement — The App has Focus Timers in addition to Focus Techniques like the Pomodoro Technique.
Task Prioritization: Using the power of AI, Neurolist automatically prioritizes your work according to urgency and priority so you can focus on the right thing.
Why Neurolist is Great for ADHD:
Neurolist simplifies task management for ADHD by using AI to break tasks into smaller, easier-to-handle steps. This AI daily planner app is highly customizable and learns your habits and preferences over Time.
Its integration of focus-boosting tools, such as the Pomodoro timer, allows ADHD users to stay focused for longer periods of Time while avoiding burnout.
Comigo: Best ADHD AI Assistant App with Smart Scheduling
Comigois an AI assistant app for ADHD that combines therapy and productivity features under one platform. It’s an AI assistant that creates personalized task analysis with smart scheduling, focusing, and task management tools.
You can live day to day with very little hassle due to its adaptive traits. You can tell Comigo about your day-to-day life or symptoms of your ADHD, and it’ll give you an actionable plan based on analysis.
This app is like a therapist and a productivityassistant on a single platform. One of its standout features is the ability to track daily progress, offering motivation and positive feedback to reinforce good habits.
Comigo integrates AI to create smart reminders based on your schedule, helping you stay on track without feeling burdened.
Key Featuresof Comigo:
Adaptive Scheduling: Their AI learns from your habits and can recommend the best times to get things done — dynamically adjusting on the fly. It can generate manageable, smaller to-do’s tailored to your habits and give you personalized AI coaching and assistance.
Chaos to order: After you’ve entered your thoughts and ideas, Comigo will turn your thoughts and brain dumps into actionable steps while also breaking them down into smaller tasks.
Cognitive assessment results: This provides a summary of completed tasks, achievements, and progress you made towards your goals. It also offers positive feedback, helping to build motivation and reinforce a sense of accomplishment.
Why Comigo is Great for ADHD:
Comigo stands out as an ADHD AI assistant app because it combines therapy and productivity features to offer a personalized daily planning solution.
Whether it’s work, personal tasks, or both, Comigo makes it easy to stay on top of your day. Personalized scheduling and task breakdowns help take the mental load off, something many with ADHD can really appreciate.
Sunsama: The Ultimate Daily Planner for ADHD
Sunsama is a daily planner that is particularly ideal for people with ADHD. It offers features like guided daily planning, daily and weekly reviews, Pomodoro sessions, Focusmode, weekly objectives, and more.
Every day, Sunsama will prompt you to plan your day ahead; you can also set up weekly objectives. While Sunsama requires manual input, it’s one of those apps that motivates you to stay productive rather than just automating tasks and forgetting about them.
If you want an automated Sunsama alternative, check out Motion vs Sunsama.
Sunsama also works as a task consolidation app (similar to Akiflow) by integrating seamlessly with other task management tools like Asana or Todoist.
You can have a unified view of all your work and personal tasks under one platform. Sunsama stands out for its ability to plan out an entire day’s tasks, offering a clear and focused roadmap for ADHD users.
Key Featuresof Sunsama
Guided daily Planning: Sunsama helps you plan your day and week beforehand, set tasks with deadlines, priorities, and subtasks, and add files or notes for extra detail.
Daily Task Plannerand Task Consolidation: You can easily drag and drop tasks for the day from other apps like Asana or Todoist under Sunsama’s unified view. This helps you see all your work and personal tasks in one place, making it easier to manage your day.
Daily and weekly review: In Sunsama, each day starts with a daily review of the progress of the previous day’s tasks and productivity level. Also, at the end of each week, you can review your progress with weekly stats.
Focus mode and Pomodoro session: Sunsama’s Focus mode has an extremely minimal interface with no distracting sidebar or features; also, let’s not forget the iconic Pomodoro session.
Why Sunsama is Great for ADHD:
Sunsama is a dedicated daily planner for ADHD. It not only guides users in mindfully planning out their days but also offers daily and weekly reviews of their productivity.
Plus, Sunsama lets you easily drag and drop tasks from other productivity apps like Asana into its unified Calendar. This seamless integration helps you see all your tasks, whether personal or work-related, in one place.
The best part is that Sunsama is one of the most user-friendly daily planning and scheduling apps. Plus, this app offers various keyboard shortcuts to make navigating through the app even easier.
Skedpal: One of the best AI task management apps for ADHD
Skedpalis an AI scheduling and task management app that automatically schedules your to-do list and tasks in your time-blocked Calendar.
SkedPal is an AI task manager for ADHD that gives AI suggestions on task prioritization or scheduling; for individuals with ADHD, this means fewer decision-making moments and less mental load when organizing tasks.
Via: SkedPal
This calendar management app also rearranges your schedule once tasks change or deadlines shift. Also, compared to other auto-scheduling apps like Motion vs Skedpal, this app focuses on scheduling your tasks at your preferred Time through the Time Maps feature, which makes Skedpal a more flexible Motion alternative.
The app uses time blocking and AI-driven task optimization to make sure you’re working on the right things at the right Time.
Key Featuresof SkedPal
AI suggestion: SkedPal offers AI suggestions for task prioritization and scheduling. If you’re at risk of overloading your schedule with too many tasks or unrealistic deadlines, the app will notify you and help you automatically reschedule and reprioritize.
Time Maps: This unique feature of SkedPal allows you to customize your preferred hours for auto-scheduling specific tasks. For example, you can group tasks that you need deep focus on during your most productive hours, and SkedPal will make sure to schedule those tasks accordingly.
Nested To-Do List Management: With SkedPal, you can break tasks down into the smallest details or create subtasks as many subtasks as you need, giving you a bird’s eye view of each project.
Why Skedpal is Great for ADHD:
SkedPal uses AI to provide smart suggestions for task prioritization and scheduling, ensuring you can schedule your Calendar without feeling overwhelmed.
This task management app also schedules tasks based on your preferred hours for specific activities, ensuring that each task is allocated to the Time of the day when you’re most productive or focused.
Its dynamic scheduling and task optimization help ADHD users stay on top of their tasks without worrying about the mental effort of planning.
Also, one of the notable features of SkedPal is its seamless integration between Its Calendar and To-do list. You simply create a to-do list, and SkedPal will handle the scheduling on your Calendar.
You can learn more about this AI scheduling app in this detailed SkedPal review.🌟
BeforeSunset AI: AI app that breaks down tasks for ADHD
BeforeSunset AI is an ADHD task manager that focuses specifically on breaking down complex tasks into manageable parts.
The app’s AI task breakdown feature automatically splits large tasks into smaller, actionable steps, making it easier for users to tackle projects one at a time.
Not only that, but this app automatically schedules your tasks and events based on your mood, energy, and productivity levels for the day.
BeforeSunset AI a mood-based AI daily planning assistant with features like daily and weekly productivity analytics, To-do assistant, focus mode with Pomodoro session, mood tracker and more.
It also offers smart reminders and advanced focus mode (Oasis) to help ADHD users stay on task and avoid distractions. Honestly speaking BeforeSunset AI is a hidden gem for people who are looking for an ADHD AI app.
You can read more about this mood-based task management app in this detailed BeforeSunset AI review. 🌞
Key Featuresof BeforeSunset AI:
Plan My Day: This feature helps you with daily planning and breaking down your tasks with AI. Once you create tasks, the AI will create a schedule based on priority, deadlines, availability, and mood and energy level.
To-Do Assistant: This app uses AI to generate to-do lists and subtasks for you while also estimating the Time for each of them based on your past habits.
Oasis Focusmode: It’s an AI focus mode which helps you create your ideal workspace; with the AI Ambient Sound Generator, you can also create ambient sounds. It comes with a focus timer and a Pomodoro session.
Mood-based task management: BeforeSunset AI will ask you “how you are feeling” at the start of the day and adjust your tasks accordingly.
Daily and Weekly Analytics: This app gives you insights into how you’re spending your Time by tracking both completed and pending tasks, while also providing feedback on your productivity.
Create tasks with Goals: The AI will prompt you with, “What’s your main goal?” simply type in your goal, and the AI will generate clear, concise tasks and to-do lists—complete with subtasks—for you.
Why BeforeSunset AI is Great for ADHD:
BeforeSunset AI offers ADHD-specific daily planning styles such as Eat the Frog, Quick Wins and more, which makes it a great ADHD AI planner.
It simplifies task management for ADHD by breaking down large projects and giving users a clear path forward.
This app will literally adjust your entire schedule based on your mood and energy levels for the day so you don’t get overwhelmed. This app also offers daily and weekly insights into your productivity while also giving feedback.
If you’re looking for personalized AI scheduling that adjusts to your daily preferences, you’ll love this app.
Todoist: To-do list and task management app for ADHD
Todoist is one of the most well-known To-do list and task management apps. It’s a great choice for ADHD users who prefer a clean and easy-to-use interface.
You can create both daily tasks and long-term projects in Todoist, setting due dates, priorities, labels, and filters.
Todoist interface
The app also uses natural language processing (NLP) to simplify task creation. To keep you motivated, Todoist gamifies productivity with weekly reviews and a karma system.
Todoist is also really well known for its advanced recurring task management. For those who struggle with task overload, Todoist offers the ability to organize tasks into categories and labels.
Key FeaturesOf Todoist
Natural Language Processing (NLP): Todoist allows you to create and schedule tasks using phrases like “Call John tomorrow at 3 PM,” and this app will automatically interpret the text and schedule the task at that Time.
Karma system: This feature helps you stay consistent with your productivity. You get Karma points for completing daily tasks and goals. As you get more consistent with your daily productivity, your Karma streak grows.
Recurring Tasks: You can easily create recurring tasks in Todoist by using NLP. For instance, simply type phrases like “meditation for 10 mins every morning,” Todoist will create a recurring task and also remind you to meditate every morning.
Easy task creation: Besides their iconic NLP feature for task creation, you can also create tasks by copy-pasting lines of tasks, and it’ll create a neat separate task list for you. Also, you can note down and create tasks directly from articles you read through the Todoist browser extension.
Why Todoist is Great for ADHD:
Todoist offers extensive ways to create tasks, set up recurring tasks and reminders, and categorize and label them effectively.
For those who struggle with maintaining consistency—like many people with ADHD—Todoist gamifies productivity through its Karma system, rewarding you for staying on track and helping to build a more consistent routine.
Also, there are AI tools for ADHD in Todoist, like the AI assistant, that help with task suggestions and creating sub-tasks. Also, compared to other task management apps (like Motion vs Todoist), this app has a simple and user-friendly interface.
TickTick is another popular task management app for ADHD that helps users stay organized, focused, and productive.
TickTick offers many features like task prioritization, habit tracking, and Pomodoro sessions, making it an excellent tool for ADHD users looking to manage both tasks and routines.
It also offers features, such as task tracking, reminders, and deadline management, to keep you organized.
What sets TickTick apart is its Pomodoro timer, habit-tracking capabilities, advanced reminder options, NLP-powered task creation, and a range of other personal productivity tools.
Key Featuresof TickTick
Pomodoro Timer: The built-in Pomodoro timer helps you stay focused by working in 25-minute intervals with short breaks in between.
Habit Tracker: You can customize your own habits with goals, duration, frequency, and reminders and track progress with time tracking or widgets on your devices.
Reminders: TickTick lets you set up various reminders for tasks and events, such as location reminders, constant reminders, reminders with push notifications, etc.
Why TickTick is Great for ADHD:
TickTick’s ability to track daily task progress visually and set up multiple reminders for tasks makes it a great daily planner for people with ADHD.
TickTick lets you create recurring habits and goals while also constantly reminding you about them to help you stay consistent.
Task creation is also a breeze in this app; you can create tasks with voice commands through Siri or via its NLP feature.
Some people love it: Goblin — AI-assisted ADHD Specific Task Manager Splits large sections into smaller, manageable steps, making it easier to follow the necessary steps and stay on track. I personally found this tool adorable due to how user-friendly its interface is.
This makes it easier to approach complex projects without feeling overwhelmed. Plus, Goblin’s task estimator predicts how long a task will take based on previous activity, giving you a more realistic sense of time management.
It also includes a task compiler that transforms scattered thoughts into organized tasks, a great feature for individuals with ADHD who struggle with maintaining mental clarity.
Key Features of Goblin:
Magic to do (Task Breakdown): Splits large projects into smaller manageable steps, reducing the feeling of being overwhelmed. It breaks down big tasks into smaller steps. Just enter what you need to get done, and their AI will break down the tasks for you.
Task Estimator: The Task Estimator feature uses AI to predict how long tasks will take based on previous activity and complexity. This is helpful for users with ADHD, who often struggle with time management.
Task Compiler: Organizes chaotic thoughts by transforming a brain dump—a chaotic list of random thoughts and ideas—into a structured and actionable task list.
Visual Progress Tracker: Tracks your progress visually, helping you stay motivated.
Why Goblin is Great for ADHD:
Goblin is an ideal AI tool forADHD users who find it difficult to manage large projects or chaotic thoughts. Goblin features task breakdowns and visual progress trackers to assist you with gradually completing a task.
It reminds users to time their tasks and always prioritize what really matters. Its approach makes it easier for ADHD users to stay on track and complete tasks efficiently.
Conclusion
Each of these apps offers unique features, which makes them the best fit among the three, completely dependent on your needs.
From stunning task management to task breakdown to an app that adjusts to your routine, there are AI task management apps out there that can reduce the burden of your life. Many AI-powered apps also allow you to easily create recurring tasks.
Using these tools can help ADHD individuals improve productivity, remain organized, and do a better job handling any tasks needed each day.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s)
Is there an AI task manager for ADHD?
Comigo is an AI-powered ADHD assistant that offers personalized coaching based on your unique symptoms, challenges, and goals. After assessing your ADHD profile, It creates a tailored productivity plan that adapts as you progress.
What is the best AI planner for ADHD?
Comigo is one of the best AI companions for ADHD since it’s super customized. It adjusts as you go based on your symptoms and obstacles. It adapts in real time to improve focus and performance. Prompts, feedback, and reminders make it easy to engage to improve your day-to-day performance.
What is the ADHD app that breaks down tasks?
Neurolist is an AI-powered ADHD management app that helps users break down complex tasks into smaller subtasks with an estimated time for each of them. It has personalized guidance, real-time reminders, and focus-enhancing features.
Can ChatGPT help people with ADHD?
ChatGPT can assist users with ADHD by offering task breakdowns, reminders, and productivity tips. However, it lacks deep personalization and can occasionally forget prompts, limiting its effectiveness compared to specialized ADHD tools.
What is the neurolist app for ADHD?
Neurolist is an AI-powered app designed to help individuals with ADHD by offering personalized task management, focus tools, and reminders. It helps break down large.
AI chatbots and Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving, especially since the sudden widespread popularity of ChatGPT starting in 2022.
Fast forward to 2024, and every major tech company is now either developing or integrating chatbot technology into their products and services. ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude are three of the most well-known chatbots around the world.
In this article, “ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude,” we are going to explore the pros and cons of each of them and compare their features, pricing, and use cases for you so that you can easily choose the right chatbot that suits your needs.
Let’s dive in!
Overview of ChatGPT , Gemini, and Claude.
Learning each model’s core architecture and features is important to understand their strengths and weaknesses. Let’s start by tearing each of the models apart.
ChatGPT
OpenAI developed and launched ChatGPT on November 30, 2022. With over 200 million weekly active users worldwide, It is one of the world’s most widely used AI language models.
Based on GPT-3, but now redesigned for GPT-4 and more, It aims at delivering human-like feedback and has proven itself well-suited to a wide range of text-based tasks, including creating concise and detailed content, answering questions, and helping with daily problem-solving.
It was initially free when it was first launched. However, the free version had a few limitations, such as usage caps and potential slowdowns during peak traffic times. So, they launched the paid version ChatGPT Plus, which offered priority access to the model, even during peak times.
Its biggest improvement in recent releases (March 2023), such as GPT-4, is its multimodality, whereby the model can handle text and images.
Gemini (previously known as Bard) is one of Google DeepMind’s recent AI models, the latest product to emerge from Google’s labs. A direct competitor to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Gemini specializes in delivering cutting-edge NLP solutions. It focuses on enhancing the quality of Google search results and information retrieval.
The model is better suited for creating reliable, accurate output, making it suitable for commercial and teaching purposes.
Like competitors, Gemini is extremely effective at inventive tasks such as creating content and summarizing. Still, it goes further and works very closely with Google’s ecosystem, harnessing the power of cloud computing for faster, more scalable execution.
Another AI language model developed by Anthropic is Claude. With its conversational AI capabilities, Claude is safety-focused in that its results are moral and user-driven. Claude is most well known for offering models with different capabilities, like Claude 3.5, a streamlined version that enhances previous versions.
Its focus on safety and responsible usage has earned it a place in industries that value conversational integrity. Despite its moral focus, Claude also performs great NLP in various text-based applications, from code analysis to writing.
As AI technology evolves rapidly, especially with the rise of LLMs and AI chatbots, Privacy concerns are a huge issue. Claude, however, tends to focus deeply on ethical AI practices.
Better Conversational Flow: It offers more natural dialogue than Gemini, which can feel rigid, and Claude, which is often overly cautious.
Task Flexibility: It excels at creative tasks (writing, brainstorming) compared to Gemini and Claude, which focus more on structured applications.
Customizability: Its Custom GPTs allow more tailored solutions for businesses, whereas Claude and Gemini offer less flexibility.
Wider Integration: It offers greater accessibility with tools like Microsoft 365 and Custom GPTs.
Multimodal Support: Its multimodal capabilities (text + images) with GPT-4 outperform Claude and Gemini, which are still evolving in this area.
Cons:
Hallucinations: It is more prone to “hallucinations” (if we can call it that) compared to Claude, which prioritizes safety, and Gemini, which has more accurate responses. You can sometimes get inaccurate responses with ChatGPT.
High Computational Cost: Its GPT-4 is resource-heavy, whereas Claude is more efficient, and Gemini leverages Google’s infrastructure.
Bias and Ethics: While Claude focuses on ethical AI, ChatGPT still faces bias issues, and Gemini uses Google’s content moderation to reduce harmful outputs.
Gemini
pros
Superior Accuracy: Gemini provides more accurate and factual responses than ChatGPT
Data-Rich Contexts: Gemini excels at handling complex data and technical topics, outperforming ChatGPT and Claude, which can struggle with specialized queries.
Access to real-time information: As it’s deeply integrated with Google, it has better access to live data.
Safer answers: Gemini provides safer and more reliable outputs compared to ChatGPT and Claude, which can sometimes produce controversial responses.
Cons
Less Creative Flexibility: Gemini is less flexible with creative tasks (writing, brainstorming).
Limited Multimodal Support: While ChatGPT leads with multimodal capabilities (text + images), Gemini is still developing in this space.
Safety concerns: Its ethical guidelines are more aligned with Google’s standards, which might be more focused on business and efficiency than human-centred safety.
Safety-focused: Offers safer responses than other AI models.
Empathetic Interactions: It shines at generating emotionally intelligent and empathetic responses, Compared to ChatGPT or Gemini, which can feel more robotic.
Unbiased: It is better at avoiding harmful stereotypes than ChatGPT, which still faces occasional bias issues, and Gemini, which focuses more on factual accuracy.
Specialized for Critical Use Cases: Claude is particularly effective in high-stakes areas like healthcare, law, and mental health support.
Cons
Limited Creativity: Claude is less creative than ChatGPT, especially when it comes to generating original content or brainstorming new ideas.
Lower Multimodal Capabilities: It is basically text-only for now; not even image generation capabilities are integrated.
Slow speed: Claude sometimes performs really slow.
Less Customization: Claude lacks the deep customizability features offered by ChatGPT, such as Custom GPTs, and has fewer integration options compared to Gemini, which benefits from Google’s tool integrations.
Fewer features in the free version: Compared to Chatgpt’s free version, Claude has very few features you can access in their free version.
Now, let’s examine these models based on key factors such as function, performance, cost and accessibility to understand their relative strengths and weaknesses.
Key features comparison
Understanding Prompts
ChatGPT is excellent at understanding prompts but may occasionally misinterpret overly vague prompts or struggle with highly specific subject matter, especially in the free version.
Gemini shines in understanding fact-based queries. It’s less flexible in creative tasks. However, it delivers highly precise responses for complex, fact-based queries due to having live access to the web.
Claude is cautious in interpreting prompts, especially those with moral, ethical, or controversial implications.
Accuracy
ChatGPT is more prone to “hallucinations,” meaning it’ll sometimes give you inaccurate answers with such confidence. It tends to generate useful content for general queries; however, it may provide less accurate answers for highly technical or specialized areas.
Gemini often outperforms ChatGPT when it comes to factual accuracy. It’s more precise but can sometimes be less conversational or intuitive than ChatGPT.
Claude is extremely reliable when it comes to ethical correctness and providing safe content, but it can be less detailed in terms of complex factual accuracy compared to Gemini. It sometimes sacrifices depth just to be on the safe side.
Contextual Understanding
ChatGPT is better at handling context over long periods of conversations. GPT-4 (used in ChatGPT Plus) supports a context window of 8,000 tokens (standard) and 32,000 tokens (extended). This allows it to handle longer, more complex conversations and remember more details when it comes to fluidity in dynamic conversation, ChatGPT wins.
Gemini Typically handles contextual shifts in structured settings well and can handle up to 1 million tokens. However, it is less fluid in back-and-forth exchanges compared to ChatGPT, as it prioritizes accuracy and precision over conversational flow.
Claude: Context is handled with care, especially when dealing with sensitive or ethical topics. It can handle up to 200k tokens, making it great at deeper analysis. It tracks context well within specific discussions but often errs on the side of caution, especially when the intent is unclear, making it less fluid in dynamic conversations.
Response Speed
ChatGPT is known for its fast response times, especially in its free version. Its ability to handle general queries quickly makes it ideal for casual users. However, responses can slow down with complex queries or in longer threads.
Gemini seems to get slower as the number of tokens gets higher.
Claude: Slower than both ChatGPT and Gemini, primarily due to its additional ethical safeguards and response filters.
Multimodal Capability
ChatGPT offers multimodal capabilities in the paid version. Its integration with DALL·E made it capable of advanced image generation. This makes it highly versatile for tasks that involve both written and visual data, like generating captions or describing visual content.
Gemini is known for high Multimodal functionality. While ChatGPT focuses on text and image generation, Gemini focuses on text, voice, and visual data processing.
Claude: Text-only for now. Like Gemini, Claude doesn’t support multimodal inputs (such as images) and is strictly focused on natural language processing.
Integrationand Developer tools
ChatGPT supports various APIs, including access to GPT-4, GPT-3.5, DALLE (for image creation and editing), and Whisper (for speech-to-text).
Gemini benefits from seamless integration with Google Cloud’s suite of developer tools and APIs, including Vertex AI, which allows developers to train custom models.
Claude’s integration capabilities are more limited than those of ChatGPT and Gemini. It doesn’t offer the same level of integration with external tools, making it less versatile for users looking to extend its functionality.
Security
ChatGPT has some concerns about data handling and over-optimization for SEO. There are occasional concerns about how it handles personal or sensitive information.
Geminiis a part of Google’s broader ecosystem, so there could be concerns about data privacy, especially regarding personal data shared across Google’s platforms.
Claude has top-tier security and ethical safeguards. Claude emphasizes safe, responsible AI and is particularly suited for regulated industries like healthcare or law.
Ease of use:
ChatGPT is designed to be highly user-friendly. It has an intuitive interface for both beginners and experienced developers. It’s basically very easy to use.
Gemini benefits from deep integration with Google Cloud, which provides enhanced scalability and ease of use for people already working within the workspace.
Claude’s interface is more suitable for users with technical knowledge.
Use cases of ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude:
ChatGPT is ideal for content generation—such as writing articles, blog posts, or social media copy—for customer support. It can act as a chatbot that provides real-time assistance. It’s also great for brainstorming ideas, education, and coding help. Developers use it to debug code or explain programming concepts in an easier way.
For example, Here’s some screenshots of when I asked both ChatGPT and Gemini (free version) “how do chatbots work,” ChatGPT seems better for users looking for brainstorming and content generation, while Gemini is more focused on delivering quick, accurate answers.
Gemini, on the other hand, is better at handling enterprise-level, data-driven applications. For developers who work with Google Cloud, Gemini can be utilized to build scalable applications using Google’s rich cloud services.
Claude’s focus is on ethically sound and safe AI. Its power is derived from high-priority sectors such as health, law, and financial sectors that require a high degree of security and compliance. Claude can help with confidential tasks such as reviewing medical records, contracts and legal paperwork while adhering to professional standards.
Summary of AI Comparison
Feature
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
Gemini (Google DeepMind)
Claude (Anthropic)
Capterra Rating
4.5
5
4.7
Versions
GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4o
Gemini 1.0, 1.0 Pro, 1.5 Flash, Haiku, Sonnet, Opus
Users on the free plan have access to GPT-4o mini and limited GPT-4o, which is still highly capable of many basic tasks like chatting, brainstorming, and content generation.
ChatGPT Plus (Paid Plan):
Price: $20/month
Features: Access to GPT-4, Improved performance, including faster response times and priority access to new features. Access to multimodal capabilities (e.g., DALL·E for image generation
Team plan:
price: $25/month (if billed annually)
Features: all the features in the Plus plan with higher usage limits
Gemini
Offers a free plan
Pricing is pay-as-you-go, and costs can vary significantly depending on the size and complexity of the model and the amount of data processed.
Claude
Claude AI Pricing (Anthropic) Pay-as-you-go API costs, based on token volume.
Prices vary according to the Claude model (Claude 1, 2, or 3).
Tokens: For both input and output, fees are determined by tokens.
Which AI tool is right for you? Factors to consider before choosing:
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
Best for: Conversational AI, fiction writing, content generation, code-related queries, and problem-solving.
Strength: Excellent fluency in conversation and a great amount of flexibility. It is also very good at working with tasks that require in-depth analysis, including content creation, brainstorming, and customer support. It’s a high-quality, dialogue-enabled model, which makes it the perfect solution for any company that wants to use chatbots or virtual assistants.
Limitations: While it works pretty well in general NLP applications, it doesn’t necessarily offer as much depth or accuracy as special models.
Integration capabilities: If you work with a variety of domains—such as content creation, customer support, education, or software development—ChatGPT excels due to its versatile API and seamless integration with a wide range of platforms, including Slack, Zapier, GitHub (via Copilot), and many more. However, if you or your team is heavily invested in Google products, Gemini is a better choice.
Gemini (Google DeepMind)
Best for: Innovative research apps, advanced analysis and multi-language tasks.
Strength: Gemini models are based on deep research and have multimodal processing, so they can handle text and images. If your work involves combining various kinds of data sources (such as visuals and textual content), you could try out Gemini. And it’s fast and highly accurate, at least when it comes to technical or specialty queries.
Limitations: Gemini can be more costly to deploy and, therefore, less suited for inexpensive or small-scale applications. Nor is it necessarily more specialized.
Integration capabilities: Due to its deep integration with Google products, it’s ideal for teams or users already embedded into Google Workspace.
Claude (Anthropic)
Best for Safety-related AI and compliance-related tasks.
Strength: Claude emphasizes user safety, ethics, and openness. If your app involves careful AI behaviour monitoring and ethical compliance (i.e., healthcare, legal, education), Claude will reduce toxic outputs and deliver better outcomes in high-risk scenarios.
Limitations: Claude can be less agile and sophisticated in most conversations than ChatGPT or Gemini, especially in more imaginative or dynamic applications.
Conclusion:
ChatGPT stands out in versatility, speed, and multimodal capabilities, making it ideal for a wide variety of use cases.
Gemini excels in accuracy and contextual understanding, especially for technical and factual queries within the Google ecosystem.
Claude is a leader in ethical AI and security, offering safe, balanced, and trustworthy responses but with slower speed and limited multimodal capabilities.
Each tool has its strengths depending on the needs—ChatGPT for flexibility and multimodal tasks, Gemini for technical precision, and Claude for sensitive, ethical contexts.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Claude or ChatGPT or Gemini?
If you want in-depth, creative content or brainstorming, ChatGPT is better for you. If you need quick, and factual information, Gemini excels. For balance between clarity and reasoning, Claude offers a strong middle ground. For coding, ChatGPT is ideal for detailed solutions, while Claude is great for clear, efficient code.
Which AI is better than ChatGPT?
Gemini may outperform ChatGPT in accuracy, real-time data access, and handling technical queries, especially for users embedded in Google’s ecosystem. However, ChatGPT is more versatile and excels at creative tasks and conversation flow.
What can Gemini do that ChatGPT can’t?
Gemini excels in real-time data access, especially within the Google ecosystem. It can also retrieve images from the web, which ChatGPT can’t.
Is Gemini or ChatGPT better at coding?
ChatGPT is typically better at coding tasks; it offers easier concept explanation debugging and provides practical coding help. Gemini, while accurate, focuses more on technical queries and may lack ChatGPT’s interactive coding support.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro better than ChatGPT 4?
Gemini 1.5 Pro may excel in technical precision and enterprise-level applications with Google Cloud integration. However, ChatGPT 4 is better at multimodal tasks, creativity, and versatility, making it the preferred choice for broader use cases.
In 2024, AI has become essential for companies of all sizes. Whether you are a tech giant or a smaller startup, incorporating AI assistants into your workflow can increase work efficiency significantly.
And if you are not using AI assistants, your competitors are, giving them an edge over you.
So, choosing the right AI assistant is important. Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini are two of the most notable AI assistants leading this charge.
Both are making waves in the industry by offering generative AI capabilities, but they approach their goals in distinct ways.
While Copilot is deeply embedded into the Microsoft 365 suite, Gemini works across the Google workspace.
Instead of stating the obvious, let’s compare the facts and features.
What is Microsoft Copilot?
Microsoft launched Microsoft Copilot in March 2023 as a part of their broader strategy to integrate Generative AI into their productivity tools( Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, etc. ). It is powered by OpenAI’s GPT (Generative Pretrained Transformer) models. Now, Copilot uses the same AI model as ChatGpt.
What is Google Gemini?
Google launched Gemini on December6, 2023. Both Deepmind and Google Brain collaboratively developed Google Gemini.
Unlike other language models like OpenAI’s GPT (which Microsoft copilot uses), which are typically trained on texts alone, Google Gemini tends to be multimodal in nature. This means you can interact with a wide variety of data types (images, videos, info-graphs, charts, etc.)
Pros and Cons of Microsoft Copilot and Gemini
Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini have their strengths and weaknesses, depending on what you need from an AI assistant. Let’s break down the pros and cons of each to help you understand their respective advantages and limitations.
Pros of Microsoft Copilot
Its deep integration with Microsoft 365 makes it a favorable choice among businesses using Microsoft tools.
Copilot excels at data analysis in tools like Excel, automating complex calculations, generating charts, and offering insights.
Since Copilot is tied to Microsoft’s enterprise-level security infrastructure, it benefits from strong data privacy, unlike Google Gemini, which seems to have a less comprehensive security system.
Copilot has stronger code assistance features than Gemini due to their strong integration with Github, which is specifically designed to assist developers with real-time code suggestions, debugging help, code explanation, and many more.
Cons:
Its integration is limited to the Microsoft 365 tools; You wouldn’t have much access to other third-party tools.
Unlike Gemini, Microsoft Copilot does not have access to live data. It cannot include any information from the web.
Users need to be on a paid Microsoft 365 plan to access Copilot Pro, which might be a barrier for some.
Copilot sometimes struggles with highly complex or creative tasks that require deep contextual Understanding, especially outside Microsoft tools.
Google Gemini:
Pros:
Its integration with Google Search Results enables it to access live data, unlike Copilot, which only works with data that is available on the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.
As a successor to PaLM (Pathways Language Model), Gemini has better Multimodal capabilities. Meaning it can interpret images, videos, and other multimedia forms.
Due to its strong integration with Google tools (Google Search, Google Workspace (Docs, Sheets, Slides), and Google Cloud), Gemini is specifically helpful for people deeply embedded in Google Workspace.
Gemini’s advanced language model, PaLM 2, offers deep conversational AI capabilities with rich contextual Understanding across diverse topics. Making it a more versatile AI chatbot than Microsoft Copilot.
Cons:
As part of Google’s broader ecosystem, there could be concerns about data privacy, especially regarding personal data shared across Google’s platforms.
Unlike GitHub Copilot, which is integrated with Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini does not have a strong focus on assisting with software development and code-related tasks.
Some users may find it difficult to navigate Gemini’s advanced multimodal capabilities, especially if they are used to simpler text-based AI tools.
Their AI studio chat is slow.
Is Gemini better or Copilot?
For companies deeply embedded in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, Microsoft Copilot is the Ideal choice. Its seamless integration with tools like Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook makes it a natural fit. In contrast, Google Gemini is better suited for users within the Google ecosystem.
Core feature comparison: Microsoft Copilot and Gemini
1. Copilot vs Gemini code assist
Microsoft Copilot: With a partnership with GitHub Copilot, which is great for code generation and suggestions across all programming languages (python, Javascript, Java, etc.), It provides contextual code completion, bug detection, and code suggestions, making it a must-have tool for developers. It plugs directly into VS Code and other IDEs for live code help.
Google Gemini: Offers code completion and basic code generation. Unlike Microsoft Copilot, which uses GitHub (a highly well-known tool among developers), Gemini uses Google’s language models for code suggestions.
However, it is not as advanced as GitHub Copilot since it is still undergoing development. Gemini is more abstract and code-centric and isn’t so much part of developer IDEs.
It can help with a lot of the trivial code but doesn’t provide as much help or integration into the development lifecycle as Copilot.
2. User Interface:
Microsoft Copilot: Built right into Microsoft 365 (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook). It has the same UI pattern as Microsoft’s classic interface, which makes it natural for anyone who is used to the Office environment.
The assistant shows up as a side panel or toolbar widget, so you can use it without interrupting the workflow.
Google Gemini: Same for Google Workspace (Docs, Sheets, Gmail, etc.). Gemini’s UI is sleek and minimal, and it syncs with Google’s tools either via a chat bar or simple prompts. It is made with simplicity and usability in mind as if it were the Google brand for easy use.
3. Integration:
Microsoft Copilot: Built into Microsoft 365 apps, Copilot functions in Excel, Word, PowerPoint, and Outlook so users can benefit from AI suggestions directly in their tools.
It also connects with Azure OpenAI and Power Automate for higher-level workflows and enterprise-grade systems and data sources.
Other than that, Microsoft’s integration is really limited and confined to its own apps.
Google Gemini: Aimed at Google Workspace and Google Cloud-using teams primarily. Gemini syncs directly with Google Search for real-time data, Google Docs and Sheets for document and spreadsheet analysis, and Google Drive for file storage.
It also utilizes Google Cloud for real-time analytics and data processing, which is great for cloud-based scenarios.
However, similar to Microsoft copilot’s limited integration with its own apps, Gemini’s integration is limited to Google apps.
4.Contextual Understanding:
Microsoft Copilot: Contextual awareness shines in Microsoft Office apps. Copilot can search for existing documents, spreadsheets, and emails to make suggestions based on that content and schedule content.
It is good at structured data (e.g., spreadsheets) and documents and, therefore, is ideal for business functions such as data analysis, report writing, and email writing.
Unfortunately, when it comes to Chatbot, Microsoft Copilot seems to “forget” contexts over extended conversation. Users complain about having to remind the chatbot about the context over and over again.
Google Gemini: The best thing about Gemini is that their chatbot excels at generating long-form content and understanding prompts from previous conversations.
Powerful in multimodal contextual analysis, Gemini doesn’t only analyze words but images, videos, and other content. This makes it especially effective when working on design (for example, for presentations or creating images).
It can also parse the meaning from different inputs (text+picture, text+video) for better contextualization and Understanding of outputs.
5. Task Automation:
Microsoft Copilot: Designed for productivity in Microsoft tools like Excel, Copilot automates functions such as analysis of data in Excel (for creating summaries patterns), content creation in Word (for writing documents, developing insights), and email management in Outlook (for writing replies, summarizing threads).
Sync with Power Automate also gives you more power to automate your tasks with workflow across applications.
Google Gemini: Performs automation across the Google suite of products, from Google Sheets Automation with Google Apps Script to real-time data processing within Google Docs and Drive.
Its connection to Google Cloud makes it possible to automate advanced functions such as dynamic data analysis and artificial intelligence decision-making. It works especially well for workflows that need to have access to live data or share between cloud tools.
6. Chatbots
Gemini’s AI chatbot is a better writing assistant in terms of long-form writing, content generation, and brainstorming ideas compared to Microsoft Copilot.
But their chatbot tends to get slow often. Other than that, their chatbot is great at understanding prompts and contexts; you just might have to wait for a while to get answers.
However, as Gemini is still under development, let’s hope they’ll fix the lagging in the next update.
Microsoft Copilot’s chatbot, on the other hand, is better at handling complex tasks. Copilot offers powerful contextual integration with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook and is ideal for data analysis and productivity tasks in a business setting. And it’s comparatively faster than Gemini’s chatbot.
Here’s a screenshot from when I asked Microsoft Copilot and Gemini chatbots the question, “How do AI chatbots work?“. It turns out that Gemini indeed gives more thorough and long-form answers, which might be helpful for content writers. It even had drafts to choose from.
Gemini’s answerMicrosoft Copilot’s answer
Microsoft Copilot pro vs. Gemini advanced:
The option to go with Gemini Advanced or Copilot Pro is going to come down to what you’re already familiar with and what you’re trying to get assistance with.
Copilot Pro is perfect if you’re buried in Microsoft 365 (Word, Excel, Outlook) to automate repetitive tasks and data analysis and boost document and email productivity. It is designed for teams requiring Microsoft toolset integration.
Otherwise, if you’re working in the Google Workspace space (Docs, Gmail, Sheets), Gemini Advanced comes out on top with its capacity for creative work such as writing, brainstorming, and content creation. It is best at conversational AI with natural multi-turn dialogues and open-ended tasks.
For a team that blends both ecosystems, Gemini Advanced might be great for ideas and email-related tasks, and Copilot Pro is better for data-heavy, structured work.
Prices: Copilot Pro costs about $30/user/month with Microsoft 365, and Gemini Advanced is also $30/user/month with basic Google Workspace, with extras for the advanced options.
Which one Provides a better Free Plan?
Gemini Advanced wins here. While Gemini Advanced itself is a paid plan, Google offers a few handy free AI tools in their foundational products (Docs, Gmail, Sheets) for individuals and small teams that haven’t made up their minds yet. Copilot’s free options are considerably more limited, and you won’t get near what Gemini offers in terms of AI unless you pay for a Microsoft 365 plan.
Pricing comparison: Microsoft copilot and Gemini
Microsoft Copilot:
Business Plan:
Prices as low as $20/user/month on Microsoft 365 Business plan (includes Copilot features).
Enterprise Plan:
Starts at $30/user/month with Microsoft 365 Enterprise subscriptions (with all Copilot and enterprise-level capabilities).
With the $30 plan, you’re typically getting added security, compliance, and administrative features for large companies as well.
Google Gemini Advanced:
BusinessPlan:
Starts at $20/user/month for Google Workspace Business plans (Basic AI tools included).
EnterprisePlan:
It starts at $30/user/month for Google Workspace Enterprise subscriptions that get you full Gemini Advanced capabilities (AI-powered Docs, Gmail, Sheets, and more).
Although their pricing is similar, Gemini is likely more cost-effective for creative users, while Copilot is more efficient for business productivity users. Note that there’s no free trial for Microsoft’s Copilot. You would need to subscribe to Microsoft 365 to get access to Microsoft Copilot Pro. If you are looking for a free version or even a free trial, for that matter, Gemini is the better option.
Here’s a summary of what we’ve compared about Microsoft Copilot and Gemini so far:
Comparison summary
Feature
Microsoft Copilot
Google Gemini
Ratings
4.6 (Capterra)
5 stars (Capterra)
Free Trial
Not available
Available
Core Focus
Productivity tools (Excel, Word, PowerPoint, Outlook)
Creative tasks, content generation, multimodal AI
Integration
Deep integration with Microsoft 365 apps
Integrated with Google Workspace (Docs, Sheets, Gmail)
Multimodal Capabilities
Limited (focused on text)
Strong (text, images, video, etc.)
Code Assistance
Advanced (via GitHub Copilot)
Basic (code suggestions, but less advanced)
Data Access
No live web access; works within Microsoft 365
Live data access via Google Search
User Interface
Integrated into Microsoft 365 apps, side panel UI
Integrated into Google Workspace, minimal UI
Security
Strong enterprise security
Concerns around data privacy with Google ecosystem
Task Automation
Strong in Excel, Word, and Outlook
Strong in Docs, Sheets, and Google Cloud
Contextual Understanding
Struggles with complex conversations outside Office apps
Excellent conversational AI with long-form and multimodal understanding
Lacks advanced code support, limited integration with non-Google tools
Comparison summary table between Microsoft Copilot and Gemini
Conclusion:
If you have a choice between Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini, it all depends on what you need and the ecosystem you prefer.
Microsoft Copilot is a perfect fit for businesses that are deeply committed to Microsoft 365. It is highly efficient for productivity tasks such as data analysis, document automation, and email automation and is a great fit for organizations dedicated to efficiency and business management.
Copilot is ideal for those who require code support — thanks to its integration with GitHub and high-end enterprise security. However, it only integrates with Microsoft tools and lacks live data.
Google Gemini, on the other hand, excels in creative work such as content creation, brainstorming, and design. Multimodal (text, image, video) and powerful conversational AI make Gemini the ideal choice for Google ecosystem teams who care about creativity and real-time information.
It also comes with cheaper free features in Google Workspace, making it an attractive alternative for smaller teams or people looking for a more portable AI assistant.
All in all, Copilot is ideal for business productivity and data-heavy tasks. Gemini is better, if you’re more into creativity, multimodal work, and cheap-start.
Microsoft didn’t wanna fall behind in this era of AI. As more competitors like Google, Amazon, and smallerstartups started introducing advanced AI tools and features, It was time for Microsoft to integrate AI deeply into their traditional tools. That’s why, in March 2023, they officially launched Microsoft Copilot.
But just as any other AI tool, Microsoft Copilot has its drawbacks and might not suit your needs.
For example, As it’s deeply integrated with Microsoft 365, you may have integration issues in non-Microsoft shops.
So, with that in mind, we’ve listed together the top 5 Microsoft Copilot alternatives with their pros, cons, and use cases in our detailed article.
What is Microsoft Copilot: Overview
Before we get into the list of Microsoft Copilot alternatives, let’s see what Microsoft Copilot is and why you might be looking for its alternative in the first place.
Microsoft Copilot is an AI-powered assistant integrated into Microsoft 365 applications like Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams. It officially launched in March 2023. Powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4, it helps users automate tasks, generate content, analyze data, and streamline workflows, boosting productivity and simplifying complex processes within everyday business tools.
Cons of Microsoft Copilot:
Comparatively slower than other AI tools.
It may recommend suggestions that are sometimes inaccurate and irrelevant.
Integration with other third-party apps outside the Microsoft 365 suite is limited.
It is expensive.
Some users complain about not being able to reference previous conversations. For example, If you’re drafting a series of emails, Copilot may not recall information from earlier conversations. Then, you would have to constantly remind it of the context.
However, this tool is still in its early stages, considering it was just launched in 2023. Microsoft will likely address most of its drawbacks through future updates.
Copilot Alternatives
Claude AI: Better option for programming and software developers.
Gemini: Best option for users deeply integrated with Google workspace.
Meta AI: Free and ideal option for Business and developers looking for customized AI chatbots.
AmplifAI: Good alternative of Copilot as a productivity enhancement AI tool.
Claude AI (by Anthropic)
Overview:
Claude is a family of large language models developed by Anthropic. It is centered around safety and ethical issues as the main development goal. The model is used for conversational tasks, content creation, and complex problem-solving activities while tackling other risks, such as generating harmful or biased content.
It has three models:
Haiku for lightweight actions.
Sonnet for high-throughput tasks
Opus for more complex tasks such as math solving or coding.
Capterra rating: 4.8 .
Pros:
Unlike Microsoft Copilot, Claude AI can understand context over extended conversation.
They put a lot of emphasis on safety, so their AI strictly tries to avoid providing misleading or untruthful information that could harm any business.
Their code generation feature is beginner-friendly; it’ll offer clear explanations, generate code snippets, and even provide step-by-step guidance.
It’s really helpful for developers. It’ll give step-by-step guidance on debugging, identify issues, suggest fixes, and explain solutions clearly.
Some users claim it to be a better option for programming and soft dev than GPT-4 (source)
It can generate human-like content while also making sure the content sounds like you wrote it.
Cons:
It has really limited features on the free version.
You can’t generate an image.
It does not have a seamless integration with business tools like Microsoft Office or Google Workspace.
Price:
ClaudeAI
It has a Free Plan. Their Pro Plan starts at $18 monthly, and Team Plan starts at $25 monthly.
Note that Claud AI’s free Plan has more limited features than ChatGPT, So if you are looking for a free AI chatbot, ChatGPT might be a better choice.
As for Microsoft Copilot, its pro feature is only accessible through a subscription to the Microsoft 365 plan.
Microsoft 365 copilot pricing
Why use Claude AI instead of Copilot
Unlike Microsoft Copilot, Claude AI can remember the context of previous conversations over an extended period. So you wouldn’t have to remind it of the context repeatedly. Although not 100% accurate, it generally provides relevant and accurate information.
ChatGPT:
Overview:
ChatGPT was launched in November 2022 by OpenAI. Since then, the landscape of conversational AI or chatbots has practically changed. While it’s not the first conversational AI, it made a huge impact and became the most widely known AI chatbot. Now, you’ll hardly find anyone that doesn’t know of its name.
ChatGPT can generate human-like content, brainstorm ideas, generate code, etc.
Capterra rating: 4.5 .
Which you can find in Microsoft Copliot, too? Then, what is it that sets them apart? Let’s find out ChatGPT’s pros.
Pros:
Understands and remembers contexts over an extended period.
You can integrate with hundreds of plugins from the GPT store.
It generates human-like responses and contents.
Helpful for developers and website owners in solving coding issues.
Unlike Microsoft Copilot, which is deeply built into the Microsoft 365 suite, You can integrate ChatGPT with various apps.
Plugins like the Python tool can help with coding-related tasks, making it a better alternative for developers than Copilot’s more limited IDE focus.
Cons
It lacks deep integration with Office tools such as Microsoft Office, unlike Copilot.
Its premium features can get expensive.
It Provides inaccurate information sometimes.
Pricing of ChatGPT:
ChatGPT Pricing
With their Free Plan, You’ll get access to GPT-4o mini and limited access to GPT-4o.
In the case of a free AI chatbot, ChatGPT is one of the best choices out of the alternatives.
Their Pro Plan starts at $20 per month; you’ll get access to GPT-4
Why choose ChatGPT over Microsoft Copilot?
Unless your work is deeply integrated into Microsoft Office tools, ChatGPT is a better choice for an AI assistant. It can be flexible in many areas, such as content development, coding, problem-solving, and research, without being tied to a specific software Ecosystem.
Gemini
Overview:
Gemini (previously BARD) is a recent AI model introduced by Google DeepMind, with applications in natural language processing, problem-solving, and content creation.
It has perfect integration with Google Workspace and uses Google’s search engine to get live data, which makes it a perfect choice for research and dynamic tasks.
The most likable thing about Gemini is that it’ll give you the most up-to-date information as it’s integrated with Google. You can even use Gemini as a productivity app. For example, you can generate emails, create reports, and summarize documents directly from Google Drive.
Capterra rating: 5.
Pros:
The biggest advantage of Gemini over Microsoft Copilot is its real-time data access. Copilot doesn’t have live data, a huge drawback for many people.
The image generator is available in the free version.
It has deep integration with Google Workspace, so it’s highly compatible with Google tools such as Docs, Drive, and Gmail.
It understands your given prompts well.
Gemini has a “Multimodal AI” system, which means you can share Photos, texts, and videos with your AI assistant.
Cons:
It’s less convenient to work with other tools that are not Google products.
Gemini is still evolving, as the more efficient versions of this product are still under development.
Privacy Concerns: Many users would be worried about their data privacy.
Pricing of Gemini:
Gemini pricing
Gemini Business plan: starts at $20 per month, Gemini Enterprise: starts at $30 per month.
Why choose Gemini over Microsoft Copilot?
The biggest advantage of Gemini over Microsoft Copilot is that it has access to live data; Copilot falls short in this category. Gemini, on the other hand, can pull real-time data directly from Google’s search engine. Like Copilot, you can use Gemini as a productivity tool, but it’s deeply integrated with Google tools. It’s a great AI assistant, especially if you work with tools from Google Workspace.
From our discussion, Gemini stands out as the best choice among Microsoft Copilot alternatives. It offers a lower-cost option with access to live data from Google. Unless you’re deeply integrated into the Microsoft ecosystem, Gemini is the better choice for you.
If you want a more detailed Comparison On Gemini and Microsoft Copilot, click here.
Meta AI
Overview:
Meta’s AI models, like LLaMA (Large Language Model Meta AI), are part of the company’s push into the AI landscape. Meta focuses on large-scale models for tasks like summarization, question answering, and generative text.
Pros:
It’s ideal for developers or businesses who want to customize the AI model to fit specific needs.
With the new updated version, you can now share and interact with photos with your AI assistant.
It excels in tasks that require deep understanding, like summarization or generating long-form content.
They offer some of the most advanced capabilities in natural language processing. This is because Meta’s models are often developed using cutting-edge research.
Cons:
It is limited to some specific regions, meaning it’s not available to everyone worldwide.
Unlike Microsoft Copilot, which seamlessly integrates with office apps and business workflows, Meta’s AI models are more focused on research and academic use.
It can sometimes be intrusive. Which, in turn, ended up annoying a lot of users.
Pricing of Meta AI
Meta AI is free to use; it also has an image generation feature in its free Plan.
One of the advantages Meta AI has over Microsoft Copilot is that you can generate up to 100 images with Meta AI, unlike Copilot’s limitation with up to 15 image generation with its free Plan.
Why use Meta’s AI instead of Copilot:
Why use Meta’s AI instead of Copilot: Meta AI is a great choice when you are in the software developer or researcher field and looking for something very flexible, and you can run it for specific jobs. It is not very good for average users or people who want to use un-modified productivity tools, but it is the perfect choice for situations where customization and the most recent research are the strongest points.
AmplifAI
Overview:
AmplifAI is an artificial intelligence-powered platform primarily focused on Contact center and Customer experience management. It helps train workers and team members and increase team efficiency through the help of AI. What people really like about this platform is that its AI will give you data-driven insights into employee performance. It is an AI-powered employee performance acceleration platform.
Pros:
It has AI-driven, tailored feedback, which helps agents improve based on their weaknesses.
It Provides managers with real-time performance insights to take action against the employees.
It Seamlessly integrates with existing CRM and WFM systems.
Cons of AmplifAI:
Requires Data Quality – High-quality interaction data is needed to generate actionable insights.
Learning Curve: unless you are familiar with AI tools, it can be overwhelming and complex for you.
Cost – This could be expensive for smaller businesses or startups due to the complexity of the solution.
Why choose AmplifAI over Microsoft Copilot?
Unlike Copilot, AmplifAI integrates across a wide range of platforms outside Microsoft 365 suit, enabling a more flexible, scalable solution for both creative and business workflows.
Conclusion: Why Choose These Over Microsoft Copilot?
Gemini: It is ideal for Google ecosystem users looking for a free, research-focused assistant.
ChatGPT: It offers a powerful, customizable AI assistant that supports a wide range of applications, including coding and content creation.
Meta AI: IT is great for developers and researchers who need an open-source, cutting-edge language model.
Claude AI: Great at remembering context from previous conversations; helpful for beginner software developers.
Ultimately, the choice depends on your specific needs. If your workflow revolves around Microsoft products, Copilot may be the best fit. However, for greater flexibility, affordability, or specialized use cases, these alternatives provide a strong competitive edge.
